TSA nominee won’t commit to collective bargaining rights

During his first confirmation hearing in Washington on Tuesday, President Obama's nominee to lead the Transportation Security Administration pledged to boost training for employees but would not commit to extending collective bargaining rights to agency screeners.

"From my military service, I know all too well how important a well-trained workforce is," said Maj. Gen. Robert Harding before the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee. "You have my commitment to enhance training opportunities and invest in developing TSA's employees."

After Sen. George LeMieux, R-Fla., asked how Harding would move TSA toward an airport security model more similar to the intensive and multilayered security practiced by Israeli authorities, Harding said the answer was "training, training, more training in droves," and that he wanted TSA's workforce to adopt a drilling model like the one used in Israel.

Harding also said raising morale among the workforce would be a high priority if he is confirmed. Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., said he was concerned by discussions he'd had with TSA screeners at Washington-area airports that reflected low morale and high turnover. Warner speculated that some of that turnover might be local and due to the availability of federal security jobs in other agencies with better reputations in the greater Washington area.

"I will be looking for those performance metrics and milestones within the TSA," Warner noted, emphasizing the need for the agency to demonstrate more progress in challenging areas.

While Harding was enthusiastic about improving training and professionalism for TSA workers, he would not commit to a position on collective bargaining rights for TSA screeners, an issue Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, R-Texas, the committee's ranking member, pressed him on. When the agency was established in 2002, Congress gave the TSA administrator the authority to decide whether to give the workforce those rights. During the George W. Bush administration, TSA decided not to permit the workforce to bargain collectively, although the American Federation of Government Employees and the National Treasury Employees Union began organizing TSA locals.

"Previous TSA administrators have said that they would be very, very concerned about collective bargaining not allowing the flexibility that you need to deploy forces you need to a certain area of an airport, to a certain airport, to change working hours if a crisis situation is at hand," Hutchison told Harding. "I hope you will also be looking at the flexibility of the workforce and the need for that flexibility as one of your priorities."

Harding said that while he had begun discussions with TSA stakeholders on the question of collective bargaining, he believed he still had to talk to members of the agency's workforce and officials across the Homeland Security Department before advising DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano on screeners' rights.

"All parties agree on the need for flexibility and agility, all parties agree on the need for the administrator to have the ability to move screeners on a moment's notice," he said of his discussions so far. "We would never bargain away security."

Harding's nomination process has not been without controversy. Recently, he has come under fire for interrogation-related work that a contracting company he founded performed in Iraq at Abu Ghraib. The company reimbursed the government $2 million after overbilling for its services.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.