Lawmakers race the clock to extend surveillance provisions

With less than three weeks to go and a congressional recess looming, key lawmakers and aides have been scrambling to find a legislative solution to prevent government surveillance and intelligence-gathering powers from expiring at the end of the month.

With national security shaping up to be a major issue this election cycle, Democrats are under intense pressure to reauthorize three expiring provisions of the USA PATRIOT Act.

As of late Friday, Senate Democratic leaders were moving toward including a one-year extension of the provisions in their jobs bill, which was expected to be introduced this week.

The provisions set to expire give the government the ability to use roving wiretaps to monitor the communications of suspects; get special court orders forcing businesses to turn over evidence, and conduct surveillance on a so-called "lone wolf," or somebody who is not knowingly associated with terrorists.

But questions remained whether Democratic leaders would do a clean reauthorization of the provisions or try to make substantive changes to them. A spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., declined to comment Friday, while aides for other key lawmakers expressed frustration and confusion over the unresolved issue.

"It's hard to know what the starting point is until you figure out who's amenable to what," one aide said. "Leadership is still trying to figure out how they can get this done."

But if Democrats try to make substantive changes to the PATRIOT Act in the jobs bill, Republicans said it would result in open warfare.

Indeed, Republicans have been champing at the bit to battle Democrats on national security after the Obama administration decided to charge Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab in criminal court and read him Miranda rights for attempting to blow up an airplane over Detroit on Christmas Day.

"If they make any attempt to water down our defenses against terrorists, I think they would be making a mistake," said House Judiciary Committee ranking member Lamar Smith, R-Texas.

"They've already got a long list of ways and policies that they've undertaken that endanger Americans, and if they water down the PATRIOT Act, I think that would be close to the last straw in their efforts to weaken our defenses against terrorists," he added.

Senate Judiciary Committee ranking member Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., said he believed the election of Sen. Scott Brown, R-Mass., has altered the political landscape for Democrats in their handling of security issues.

"There's no need to weaken these provisions," Sessions said. "I think the ground has shifted a bit after the Massachusetts vote, and his strong view that we need to strengthen national security."

But Sessions, Smith and other Republicans conceded that they would support adding a short-term, clean reauthorization of the provisions in the jobs bill to give lawmakers more time to work out their differences. They said the reauthorization could be for three or six months.

Both the Senate and House Judiciary committees have passed bills to address the expiring provisions, and both bills would make several changes to the provisions.

The House bill is considered to be the most far-reaching, because it would allow the lone-wolf provision to expire and would place stricter standards on the government's ability to use surveillance and intelligence-gathering powers.

But the Senate Judiciary bill has been endorsed by the Obama administration, meaning it is the most likely version to get through Congress, several aides and national security experts agreed.

In an interview last week, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., did not indicate support for inclusion of the PATRIOT Act revisions in the jobs bill. He said his preference would be for the Senate to pass a stand-alone bill his panel approved in October, which reauthorizes the three provisions.

"I wish we could do that," he said.

But many civil liberties and privacy advocates support the House Judiciary bill. They note it would also rein in the ability of the government to use national security letters, which are demands for information without a court order.

"This is a fantastic opportunity to limit [national security letter] authority so it's targeted to actual terrorists," said Michelle Richardson, legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union.

"We did prefer the House bill, particularly because it had the fix for the NSLs," she added. "We're waiting to see the final language [from Democratic leaders] before we can provide an analysis to the members and make a vote recommendation."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by Brocade

    Best of 2016 Federal Forum eBook

    Earlier this summer, Federal and tech industry leaders convened to talk security, machine learning, network modernization, DevOps, and much more at the 2016 Federal Forum. This eBook includes a useful summary highlighting the best content shared at the 2016 Federal Forum to help agencies modernize their network infrastructure.

  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    GBC Flash Poll Series: Merger & Acquisitions

    Download this GBC Flash Poll to learn more about federal perspectives on the impact of industry consolidation.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    A DevOps Roadmap for the Federal Government

    This GBC Report discusses how DevOps is steadily gaining traction among some of government's leading IT developers and agencies.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.

  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    Joint Enterprise Licensing Agreements

    Read this eBook to learn how defense agencies can achieve savings and efficiencies with an Enterprise Software Agreement.

  • Sponsored by Cloudera

    Government Forum Content Library

    Get all the essential resources needed for effective technology strategies in the federal landscape.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.