Homeland Security seeks to expedite Gulf Coast recovery through arbitration

Federal Emergency Management Agency officials are working out procedural guidance for an independent arbitration process that would resolve outstanding disputes over public assistance for projects undertaken as a result of hurricanes Katrina and Rita in 2005.

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano and FEMA Administrator Craig Fugate announced the new arbitration process last week in Washington. It will offer individuals and organizations in Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas an alternative path toward resolving disagreements with FEMA over funding for recovery operations in excess of $500,000.

Applicants for public assistance who have been denied funding by FEMA or feel a project award is too small can continue to use FEMA's internal appeals process, or they can seek resolution through the new arbitration program.

FEMA expects to publish detailed rules governing the process and guidance for requesting arbitration in the Federal Register by the end of August.

Arbitration "will give us one more tool in our tool box for expediting Gulf Coast recovery efforts," Napolitano said.

Under the program, the government will create arbitration panels, each consisting of three judges from the General Services Administration's Civilian Board of Contract Appeals. As such, the judges will have considerable expertise in construction and contracting matters, and they also will have access to subject matter experts in engineering, architecture and other fields.

The arbitration panels' decisions will be final and binding.

Napolitano said arbitration would be quicker than the FEMA appeals process: "Indeed, we think most of these appeals [sent to arbitration panels] could be resolved in four to five months once they begin."

The alternative dispute-resolution process addresses a major concern of aid applicants, which is that the FEMA appeals process essentially asks agency officials to pass judgment on decisions made by colleagues.

"This arbitration option is essential because it will offer quick and fair rulings by a panel with experience in construction disputes on long-standing issues between the state and FEMA," said Paul Rainwater, executive director of the Louisiana Recovery Authority.

Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., endorsed the new process: "After years of waiting, literally thousands of projects will now have the means to move forward." Landrieu and Rainwater participated in the briefing with Napolitano and Fugate last week.

The arbitration process was authorized in the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.