Homeland Security officials defend virtual border fence program

Homeland Security Department officials Wednesday defended management of the effort to deploy a virtual fence along the Southern border, saying that they would rather delay implementation to ensure the program works.

During a hearing before the House Homeland Security Committee, Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Ralph Basham also took issue with the committee for the title of the hearing, "Mismanagement, missteps and missed benchmarks: Why the virtual fence has not become reality."

He said the agency would not rush to deploy something that doesn't work. The agency's priority is to get the virtual fence, known as the Secure Border Initiative or SBInet, right before deploying it.

He voiced frustration that the agency has been criticized for moving too fast to deploy unproven technology while also being blasted for missing deadlines. "While I can't say SBInet is not without problems, it is not a failure," Basham said, adding that the agency's "commitment to get it right" has never been stronger.

Basham's comments came in response to the latest Government Accountability Office report on the project. "SBInet program uncertainties, such as not fully defined program expectations, changes in deployment schedules and confusion over the applicability of environmental regulations continue to delay SBInet technology deployments," GAO's Richard Stana told the committee. Deployment of the first phase of the project in Tucson and Yuma, Ariz., and El Paso, Texas, was supposed to be completed in 2008, but it has been pushed to early next year.

When asked by Homeland Security Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., whether the technology requested for the virtual fence's demonstration project is working as expected, Stana said it "has not met expectations" and the contract language was written in a manner that makes it difficult to assess.

"We were told that this is not a complicated procurement," Thompson said. The committee wants to "see whether the taxpayers are getting what they paid for." Basham and his deputy, Jayson Ahern, noted that there has been some confusion over the purpose of the demonstration project and even if it has not operated as hoped, agency officials have learned much from the effort. "That's what a proof of concept is," Ahern said.

Basham stressed that SBInet and other technologies are just one piece of the agency's comprehensive effort to secure the border, which also includes adding more border patrol agents, using unmanned aerial vehicles and constructing a physical fence along 670 miles of the border. Basham told the committee that all 670 miles of the physical fence will be completed, under construction or under contract by December.

CPB has asked Congress for approval to shift some funds from SBInet to help deal with higher fuel and material costs for the physical fence.

Homeland Security Committee ranking member Peter King, R-N.Y., defended the agency's efforts and chastised the committee for failing to pass a Homeland Security authorization bill. "So while you're sitting here today listening to abuse about what hasn't been done, I think a lot of people should be pointing fingers at themselves as far as what hasn't been done on this end as far as getting the job done," he said.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.