Military services launch projects to beef up data sharing and security

The Navy will kick off a procurement this year for a worldwide network, the new Air Force Cyber Command will take over operation of Air Force networks, and the Army is seeking to find the right cost model for its stateside data processing centers. Top officials detailed these plans on Thursday in McLean, Va., at the annual Federal Networks Conference, sponsored by Telestrategies and Suss Consulting.

In the fall, the Navy will release a request for proposals for its Next Generation Enterprise Network to serve users at bases in the United States and overseas with an award planned in February 2009, said Rear Adm. (Select) David Simpson, director of the fleet and allied requirements division for the Office of the Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Communications Networks.

NGEN will replace the Navy Marine Corps Intranet, which serves Navy users in the United States and Marine users on bases worldwide. It also will replace the Outside the Continental United States Navy Enterprise Network (ONE-NET) for users overseas. NGEN will serve as the building block for a new naval network environment, Simpson said, and incorporate the Information Technology for the 21st Century Network (IT-21) for users at sea.

Simpson declined to put a price tag on NGEN, but told conference attendees that the Navy spends $1.5 billion a year to operate the Navy Marine Corps Intranet. EDS manages the intranet under a $10 billion contract to support 500,000 users. That contract will expire in 2010.

Security is the paramount task for the new enterprise network, Simpson said, with ease of transition from NMCI and ONE-NET a close second. Unlike the intranet, which operates under a managed service contract, the Navy needs command and control of network resources, he said. NGEN must be survivable, adaptable and focused on warfighter requirements, he added.

At the Air Force, the new Air Force Cyber Command will operate all networks and host data at major area processing centers at strategic U.S. locations, Col. Steve Hennessy, director of enterprise capabilities at the Air Force Communications Agency, said at the conference. He said installations no longer can run their own data centers because 9,000 Air Force communicators will be cut by the end of fiscal 2009.

States including Colorado, Louisiana, Virginia and New Mexico are lobbying to be the home of the new Cyber Command headquarters, but the Air Force does not plan to make any basing decision until late this year. The command is provisionally located at Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana.

At the Army, two area processing centers have been established to host applications and e-mail in the United States, primarily to beef up information security. The centers are located at Defense Information Systems Agency facilities in Columbus, Ohio, and Oklahoma City, but the Army anticipates the need to build more.

Gary Winkler, the Army's program executive officer for Enterprise Information Systems, said at the conference that he released a request for information from industry to develop the best cost and structure model for the centers. The Network Enterprise Technology Command had developed a cost model that was unaffordable, Winkler said in an interview, which is why he has sought industry help.

Winkler declined to discuss dollar figures, but he did say the Army needed a better and less costly approach than the one developed by NETCOM. This could include hosting Army applications at commercial data centers or seeking a better deal from DISA, he said.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

    View
  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

    View
  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

    View
  • GBC Issue Brief: The Future of 9-1-1

    A Look Into the Next Generation of Emergency Services

    View
  • GBC Survey Report: Securing the Perimeters

    A candid survey on cybersecurity in state and local governments

    View
  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.

    View
  • eBook: State & Local Cybersecurity

    CenturyLink is committed to helping state and local governments meet their cybersecurity challenges. Towards that end, CenturyLink commissioned a study from the Government Business Council that looked at the perceptions, attitudes and experiences of state and local leaders around the cybersecurity issue. The results were surprising in a number of ways. Learn more about their findings and the ways in which state and local governments can combat cybersecurity threats with this eBook.

    View

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.