GAO says cost of Army's 'modular' conversion will climb

The cost of the Army's effort to restructure its combat brigades is expected to exceed the last estimate of $52.5 billion as the service tries to fill the 190 planned "modular" units with enough equipment and personnel over the next several years, congressional investigators concluded in a report Monday.

The Army has not put a final price tag on equipping the new units, nor have officials provided "sufficient information" on their progress in creating the smaller and more rapidly deployable combat brigades, according to the report released by GAO.

"Without better [management] controls, decision makers will have difficulty assessing the Army's progress in meeting its goals, knowing what resources will be required to equip and staff modular units, and balancing funding requests for these initiatives with other competing priorities," the report said.

With a modular structure, Army leaders say they will be able to mix and match units so they can tailor the capabilities of the forces they deploy to particular missions or contingencies.

In early 2004, Army officials projected they needed $20 billion to create the modular units. By the end of that year, the Army had increased the scope of its so-called modularity efforts and received approval from then-Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to spend $52.5 billion through fiscal 2011.

Army officials believe they will need additional funding through fiscal 2017 to fully equip the units by 2019.

During a review of 10 of the 138 modular units already created, GAO investigators found that they all had shortfalls in key personnel and equipment, including tactical wheeled vehicles and so-called blue-force tracking gear, which keeps track of friendly forces on the battlefield.

The Iraq war -- particularly, its toll on the Army's equipment stocks -- has exacerbated the service's plans to create the modular units. Indeed, the Army had assumed several years ago that much of the equipment deployed to Iraq would return to the United States in good enough condition to be used by the new units.

"Given the heavy use of equipment in Iraq and Afghanistan, this assumption may no longer be valid," GAO said.

Meanwhile, service officials had originally planned to give Army National Guard and Army Reserve units some older models of equipment, but the high demand now for reserve units has made them rethink those plans.

In addition, the original $52.5 billion estimate was devised before the Army had finalized unit designs for the modular brigades.

In its report, GAO warned that the Army "will not be in a good position to identify and provide transparency to Congress of its total funding needs" without a complete cost estimate for the conversion to modular units.

And investigators emphasized that Army plans to pay for the unit conversion out of both its annual base budget and wartime supplemental spending accounts further complicates lawmakers' ability to understand the full scope of the Army's financial needs.

"Our work has shown that major transformation initiatives have a greater chance of success when their funding plans are transparent, analytically based, executable, and link to the initiative's implementation plans," their report said.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.