Report faults State IG's management, but not motives

State Department Inspector General Howard Krongard has been an unpopular boss who often dressed down employees and nixed travel requests, according to documents released by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee and interviews. But at a hearing today, Krongard and committee Republicans will argue that his actions have not been politically motivated.

House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Henry Waxman, D-Callif., has highlighted accusations by State Department IG employees who say Krongard blocked a series of investigations into contractor fraud and other malfeasance in Iraq and Afghanistan.

In a Sept. 18 letter, Waxman cited allegations that Krongard stopped investigators from cooperating with a Justice Department probe into problems with construction of the U.S. Embassy in Iraq, prevented employees from traveling to Afghanistan to seize evidence of procurement fraud and improperly alerted the target of an investigation about an impeding probe.

Witnesses said Krongard "interfered with ongoing investigations to protect the State Department and White House from political embarrassment," Waxman wrote. But in a 117-page report to be released today, the committee's minority staff, quoting witness depositions, said while many staffers were frustrated by Krongard's style and decisions, no evidence has emerged that his motives were partisan.

A longtime private-sector auditor, Krongard had the type of experience that would have appealed to Waxman, who faulted President Bush in a 2004 report for appointing political operatives as inspectors general instead of professional auditors.

Krongard, the new GOP staff report notes, has made contributions to both political parties.

Committee interviews show many IG employees believed Krongard acted to protect the administration. Some pointed, in particular, to a delay of an investigation into corruption by an unnamed senior State Department official whom Krongard knew. But all witnesses, some of whom left their posts under pressure, conceded they had not seen evidence of Krongard's motives.

"The perception among us at the worker bee ... levels, was that he was trying to protect the administration. That was our perception, rightly or wrongly," State Department investigator Brian Rubendall told the committee.

Krongard has said budget restrictions and concerns about his staff's ability influenced his decisions. And while the minority report blasts Waxman for quickly publicizing charges about Krongard's possible political motives, both sides agree Krongard was hard on staff, blocking creativity and driving off many employees by publicly assailing their abilities.

But some backed Krongard's self-description as an "equal-opportunity offender."

"I consider him apolitical in that he'll give anybody, any time, anywhere, a hard time," Deputy Inspector General William Todd said in a deposition.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.