Report faults State IG's management, but not motives

State Department Inspector General Howard Krongard has been an unpopular boss who often dressed down employees and nixed travel requests, according to documents released by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee and interviews. But at a hearing today, Krongard and committee Republicans will argue that his actions have not been politically motivated.

House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Henry Waxman, D-Callif., has highlighted accusations by State Department IG employees who say Krongard blocked a series of investigations into contractor fraud and other malfeasance in Iraq and Afghanistan.

In a Sept. 18 letter, Waxman cited allegations that Krongard stopped investigators from cooperating with a Justice Department probe into problems with construction of the U.S. Embassy in Iraq, prevented employees from traveling to Afghanistan to seize evidence of procurement fraud and improperly alerted the target of an investigation about an impeding probe.

Witnesses said Krongard "interfered with ongoing investigations to protect the State Department and White House from political embarrassment," Waxman wrote. But in a 117-page report to be released today, the committee's minority staff, quoting witness depositions, said while many staffers were frustrated by Krongard's style and decisions, no evidence has emerged that his motives were partisan.

A longtime private-sector auditor, Krongard had the type of experience that would have appealed to Waxman, who faulted President Bush in a 2004 report for appointing political operatives as inspectors general instead of professional auditors.

Krongard, the new GOP staff report notes, has made contributions to both political parties.

Committee interviews show many IG employees believed Krongard acted to protect the administration. Some pointed, in particular, to a delay of an investigation into corruption by an unnamed senior State Department official whom Krongard knew. But all witnesses, some of whom left their posts under pressure, conceded they had not seen evidence of Krongard's motives.

"The perception among us at the worker bee ... levels, was that he was trying to protect the administration. That was our perception, rightly or wrongly," State Department investigator Brian Rubendall told the committee.

Krongard has said budget restrictions and concerns about his staff's ability influenced his decisions. And while the minority report blasts Waxman for quickly publicizing charges about Krongard's possible political motives, both sides agree Krongard was hard on staff, blocking creativity and driving off many employees by publicly assailing their abilities.

But some backed Krongard's self-description as an "equal-opportunity offender."

"I consider him apolitical in that he'll give anybody, any time, anywhere, a hard time," Deputy Inspector General William Todd said in a deposition.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by Brocade

    Best of 2016 Federal Forum eBook

    Earlier this summer, Federal and tech industry leaders convened to talk security, machine learning, network modernization, DevOps, and much more at the 2016 Federal Forum. This eBook includes a useful summary highlighting the best content shared at the 2016 Federal Forum to help agencies modernize their network infrastructure.

  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    GBC Flash Poll Series: Merger & Acquisitions

    Download this GBC Flash Poll to learn more about federal perspectives on the impact of industry consolidation.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    A DevOps Roadmap for the Federal Government

    This GBC Report discusses how DevOps is steadily gaining traction among some of government's leading IT developers and agencies.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.

  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    Joint Enterprise Licensing Agreements

    Read this eBook to learn how defense agencies can achieve savings and efficiencies with an Enterprise Software Agreement.

  • Sponsored by Cloudera

    Government Forum Content Library

    Get all the essential resources needed for effective technology strategies in the federal landscape.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.