Homeland Security officials say government unprepared for dirty bomb

Government agencies lack the capability to deal quickly and efficiently with a so-called dirty bomb attack on the United States, members of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Government Management Subcommittee were told Thursday.

"EPA's analysis of the nation's existing radiological laboratory capacity revealed a significant capacity gap," Thomas Dunne, EPA's associate administrator of homeland security, testified. "This capacity gap will result in a lack of timely, reliable and interpretable data and will delay national and local response and consequence management activities."

A recent investigation by the House Science Committee found that the United States has a shortage of laboratories to test individuals exposed to radiation after a dirty bomb attack.

Asked by Sen. Norm Coleman, R-Minn., what needs to be done, Dunne said the labs "are not going to stay in business unless there's some revenue involved."

He said there are fewer incidents that call for radiological labs and decontamination equipment outside of an attack, intimating that if the government wants the capability in place, it will have to pay for it.

Dunne said that storage capacity for contaminated soil, water and other debris is limited as well.

"We need to improve storage; it just doesn't exist," he said. "Nobody's going to build these things unless there's a reason," he said.

Radiological countermeasures, like drugs that would work to decontaminate people's bodies if they had ingested radiation, also are years away.

Richard Hatchett, associate director for radiation countermeasure research and emergency preparedness at the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Disease, said such countermeasures are in the "early stages of development and face a long road before they are available" to the public.

The testimony did not serve to make Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Government Management Subcommittee Chairman Daniel Akaka, D-Hawaii, feel confident.

He said it was not a question of "if" a dirty bomb attack comes, but "when."

"We must be prepared for such an eventuality," Akaka said, about a dirty bomb, citing the lack of coordination by government agencies in the wake of Hurricane Katrina.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.