Leaders of anti-terrorism panel sketch future goals

The former leaders of a commission that investigated the terrorist attacks of six years ago Tuesday said progress has been made in deterring terrorism but more political leadership and follow-through is needed, especially from Congress.

The passage of time since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks has made the United States "distracted and complacent," said former Rep. Lee Hamilton, D-Ind., who served as vice chairman of the 9/11 Commission. Former New Jersey Republican Gov. Tom Kean, who chaired the commission, said progress on homeland security has been made but has been "difficult" and "very slow."

Speaking at a press conference, Kean and Hamilton praised a new law to implement unfulfilled recommendations of their panel. Hamilton said "about 80 percent" of the commission's recommendations have now been adopted completely or in part.

Kean said Congress needs to provide funding for states to implement the so-called REAL ID Act, which requires them to begin issuing secure, standardized driver's licenses. Both Kean and Hamilton said the Bush administration also has not done enough to develop technology that would detect a nuclear bomb inside the United States.

"There is nothing that comes anywhere near close to this threat, and therefore it should be the absolute highest priority," Hamilton said.

Both leaders also agreed that Congress needs to further consolidate and improve its oversight of the Homeland Security Department and intelligence community. Hamilton added that the intelligence community needs to improve its human intelligence capabilities, which means recruiting and retaining spies.

"We're still hung up on technology, and we think technology is going to answer all our questions," he said.

Kean and Hamilton decried a lack of emphasis on privacy and civil liberties protections inside the Bush administration. Hamilton said that for the last six years, security measures have trumped privacy and civil rights protections within policy debates. He said Congress and the courts are now pushing back.

"Somebody has to be watching it and saying how does this proposal impact the civil liberties and the privacy of Americans, and they have to push hard on that question," he said.

Kean and Hamilton both expressed hope that the administration's privacy and civil liberties oversight board will become more forceful.

Kean noted that the threat of terrorism is expected to last for generations. "We cannot just let our civil liberties go for that period of time," he said. "We have to establish a framework."

The Bush administration, meanwhile, used the 9/11 anniversary to tout its anti-terrorism efforts of the past six years. A fact sheet released by the White House listed the creation of the Homeland Security Department and the position of National Intelligence Director as major achievements. The administration also noted the passage of the USA PATRIOT Act and last month's update of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

But the White House urged lawmakers to make permanent the FISA changes they authorized this summer. The revised law make it easier for intelligence officials to authorize spying, but the White House said "meaningful liability protection" for telecommunications companies that assist such efforts is still needed.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.