NASA report rebuts astronaut drinking allegations

A NASA report released Wednesday dismissed allegations made earlier this summer that astronauts were drunk during or drinking before spaceflight, and said the agency had proper safeguards in place to prevent impaired crew members from flying.

"I was unable to verify any case in which an astronaut spaceflight crew member was impaired on launch day, or any case where a manager of a flight surgeon or co-crew member disregarded their recommendation that a crew member not fly," wrote Bryan O'Connor, NASA's chief of safety and mission assurance, in the report. "I am confident that there are reasonable safeguards in place to prevent an impaired crew member from boarding a spacecraft."

The allegations surfaced in a July report by the Astronaut Health Care Review Committee. The committee was established in February after the high-profile arrest of astronaut Lisa Nowak in an alleged attack on a romantic rival. The members were tasked with evaluating the medical and mental health services available to astronauts at the Johnson Space Center in Houston.

"Two specific incidents were described where astronauts had been so intoxicated prior to flight that flight surgeons and/or fellow astronauts raised concerns to local on-scene leadership regarding flight safety," the report noted. "However, the individuals were still permitted to fly."

NASA officials immediately questioned the allegations of astronaut drinking.

Astronaut Scott Kelly, who led a shuttle mission this month, wrote a letter to several newspapers saying any suggestion that "my crew or I would ever consider launching on our mission in anything but the best possible condition is utterly ridiculous."

The Wednesday report supported Kelly's general assessment, but issued five recommendations aimed at clarifying the role of flight surgeons in determining whether astronauts were impaired and reiterating the agency's alcohol policy. Those recommendations included stationing flight surgeons in the rooms where astronauts suit up before missions, adding "drinking to excess" to a list of high-risk behaviors and considering whether to make alcohol testing mandatory.

NASA Administrator Michael Griffin noted O'Connor's report surveyed 20 years of flight records, and said, "His review found no evidence that astronauts were ever impaired by alcohol."

But Griffin also emphasized that the agency is developing an astronaut code of conduct to codify long-standing expectations of behavior.

O'Connor said the investigation was unusually comprehensive, noting that since 1972, the only investigations for which he had spoken to more witnesses were the probes into the Columbia and Challenger disasters.

"We take these allegations very seriously," Griffin said, "but I've also said that the stories cited seem improbable."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.