Senate drops effort to grant airport screeners bargaining rights
- By Brittany Ballenstedt
- July 9, 2007
- Comments
The provision, included in a measure to implement the unfulfilled recommendations of the 9/11 Commission, would have provided collective bargaining rights to thousands of airport screeners at the Transportation Security Administration.
Late last month, Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., attempted to appoint conferees for talks with the House on the legislation, but Republicans requested assurances that the measure would not grant TSA screeners collective bargaining rights. President Bush has threatened to veto the bill, citing the TSA provision.
Sheila Menz, a spokeswoman for Sen. Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn., said Reid made a compromise with Republicans to send the bill to conference without the TSA provision. On Monday, the Senate agreed by unanimous consent to move the bill forward, Menz said.
"Lieberman was fighting to keep the provision," Menz said. "It was obviously a contentious provision, but if it meant the whole bill was going to fall, [Lieberman] felt it was worth it" to compromise so the bill could move forward.
The American Federation of Government Employees and the National Treasury Employees Union criticized the action Monday, holding that it is further evidence of an anti-union bias that has affected the federal workplace over the last six years.
"It is disappointing in the extreme to see the lengths to which this administration and some Republican members of the Senate will go in order to deny basic workplace rights to a large group of federal employees who not only deserve but need them," said NTEU President Colleen Kelley.
She added, however, that House and Senate Democrats have made clear their intentions to continue working with unions to secure collective bargaining for TSA screeners in the future.
"This only makes us more determined to get bargaining rights for TSA workers which have been wrongfully denied," AFGE President John Gage said.
By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although GovExec.com does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.
'Back-Door' Base Closures
Biden Talks Loss With Fallen Troops' Families
Neely Out at GSA
More USPS Buyouts
Gimme My Discount! Deals for Feds
Buyout Watch: Who's Offering What
