Immigration bill blocked as Senate undecideds join foes

The Senate on Thursday dealt a fatal blow to President Bush's immigration plan, as a coalition of Republicans and Democrats refused to go along with their leaders' pleas to move forward with the politically explosive bill.

Supporters fell 14 votes short of the 60 needed to limit debate. The vote was expected to be close, but as momentum swung against the bill, the fence-sitters drifted into the "no" column. The 53-46 vote against the cloture motion marked the end of the comprehensive immigration debate at least until the next administration, crafters of the bill agreed.

Only 12 Republicans voted to limit debate. Senate Democratic leaders had said they needed at least 20 GOP votes to end the filibuster. Thirty-four Democrats voted for the cloture motion, short of the 38 that Democrats had said they could deliver.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said after the vote that at least four Democrats who voted against cloture would have supported it if the outcome had been closer. "Democrats support this legislation," he said. "Don't focus on the Democrats."

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., who helped craft the compromise bill, said after the vote that negotiators knew Wednesday night they did not have the 60 votes. "I thought we came close. But we had some people who just wouldn't listen. It was very difficult," Feinstein said.

The political dynamics of the bill were always precarious. President Bush led the way for Republicans, while his conservative base was bashing the bill and GOP leaders for aligning with Democrats to find a pathway to citizenship for the 12 million illegal immigrants.

Republican Conference Chairman Jon Kyl of Arizona, who led Republican supporters on the bill, said several Republicans fell off when the outcome became obvious. "The vote was going to be close to 60-40," he said. "There is no question Democrats produced more votes for this legislation than Republicans. To the extent we are all Republicans, we feel bad about that."

But Sen. Mel Martinez, R-Fla., another negotiator, pointed a finger at the bill's detractors. "The burden shifts to those who found fault with our approach," he said.

Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., one of the bill's opponents, said the next steps should focus on funding for border security. The bill included border security elements, but not enough for some.

Bush had lobbied for the bill and for Tuesday's cloture motion, which was approved 64-35. Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski was one of several Republicans who had supported that motion but voted against cloture Thursday.

Murkowski said the activities by a handful of conservative GOP senators that effectively shut down debate on amendments Wednesday evening caused her to lose confidence in the bill being improved after a cloture vote. "There were amendments that would help address the concerns that I had. We didn't see those coming through the process that we had undergone yesterday and that we anticipated today," she said. "It wasn't going to happen."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.