Committee draft of terrorism coverage bill divides industry
- By Bill Swindell
- June 18, 2007
- Comments
The draft bill, according to sources, would pit different segments of the insurance industry against each other over the provision to include coverage of a nuclear, biological, chemical or radiological attack with a 7.5 percent insurer deductible. "The jury is still out on this [provision]," said one lobbyist.
The American Insurance Association and large policyholders with hotel and retail properties back the inclusion for such coverage, but it is opposed by the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America and the National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies, which argue that it would result in massive risk exposures for smaller companies.
"Getting some availability of [nuclear, biological, chemical or radiological] coverage, we're fine with that. We just think that the government should give incentives to the private sector to do it rather than mandating it in a way that is market inefficient, and creates dislocations and potentially bankruptcies," said Ben McKay, senior vice president for federal government relations at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America.
Financial Services Capital Markets Subcommittee Chairman Paul Kanjorski, D-Pa., has scheduled a Thursday hearing for witnesses to offer opinions on the measure to reauthorize the program that expires at year's end. A markup is expected before the August recess.
The draft bill also would lower the program's trigger from the current $100 million to $50 million, which was a provision that NAMIC lobbied for because it would allow smaller carriers to participate. The draft would reauthorize the program for 10 years.
Senate Banking Chairman Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., has called for a permanent reauthorization of the program. The draft also would maintain the $100 billion program cap and contains additional language to further provide "finite liability limits" for insurers and the federal government.
Another provision would clarify that a carrier's exposure is limited to its deducible and co-payments, and claims concerning these limits would be consolidated in federal court. The draft would add group life insurance coverage to the program, which will please the American Council of Life Insurers. It would include coverage for acts of domestic terrorism; current law applies only to acts of foreign terrorism as certified by the Treasury and State departments as well as the attorney general.
By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although GovExec.com does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.
The Vast Majority of IRS Employees Aren't Corrupt
GSA Mishandled Executive Bonuses
EIG 2013 as Told by Your Tweets
Infographic: Nominee Limbo
Will You Be Furloughed?
Boldly Go Where No Fed's Gone Before
Sponsored
3 Ways Data is Improving DoD Performance
Need to Know Memo: Big Data
Cutting costs: Inside the effort to improve the efficiency of federal operations
Addressing the 3 Biggest BYOD Security Threats
