Appropriators to take up veterans, homeland security measures

The House Appropriations Committee plans to report the first four fiscal 2008 spending bills to the floor next week, totaling $160 billion in spending on a broad array of programs including homeland security, veterans' health, military housing, natural resources and the environment, nuclear programs, renewable fuels research and water projects.

In particular, the veterans and homeland security bills are widely popular with both parties, but taken together the four bills breach President Bush's request by $9 billion. Office of Management and Budget Director Rob Portman last week reiterated his threat to recommend that Bush veto fiscal 2008 spending bills if they exceed his overall $932.8 billion request.

House Democrats are clearly on pace to do so, having allotted about $21 billion extra above that figure in the budget resolution.

The four bills under consideration this week by the full committee individually violate Bush's spending requests for Appropriations subcommittees, and the $64.7 billion Military Construction-Veterans Affairs bill represents nearly half the total increase -- $4 billion above Bush's request.

That represents a $15 billion increase over the current fiscal year, or about 30 percent for programs impacting veterans and military families.

"I'd rather not" recommend a veto, Portman said, but he said Bush's budget calls for a 22 percent increase over the current year and that Republicans since 2001 have increased the veterans' health budget by around 80 percent.

Appropriations Chairman David Obey, D-Wis., recently noted the difference between Bush and Democrats overall on non-defense discretionary spending amounted to about 2 percent, calling that figure "the difference between [Bush] being president and being king."

House GOP conservatives are circulating a letter aiming to obtain the necessary 146 signatures proving Bush will have the votes to sustain a veto on spending bills.

At the end of last week they were close to hitting that target, and Portman lauded the House Republican Study Committee Chairman, Rep. Jeb Hensarling of Texas, for orchestrating the effort.

In a sign they are headed for success, even some GOP members of the House Appropriations Committee -- including ranking member Jerry Lewis, R-Calif., Legislative Branch Subcommittee ranking member Zach Wamp, R-Tenn., and Reps. Ray LaHood of Illinois and Ken Calvert of California -- have signed the conservatives' letter.

But GOP sources acknowledge they could lose support for sustaining a veto depending on the nature of the underlying bill.

Portman acknowledged the White House and Congress are on a collision course over spending, chalking it up to honest differences in philosophy. He said the two sides would eventually agree on a framework for spending bills Bush can sign.

"Chairman Obey and others think there should be more resources devoted to these, so we have a disagreement. But it's not that we're not talking," Portman told reporters. "I'm not saying this will be easy, it never is.... we always have these appropriations differences," including when Republicans controlled Congress.

In addition to the four bills going before the full Appropriations Committee, four subcommittees will also take up their fiscal 2008 bills.

Those are the State-Foreign Operations, Financial Services, Legislative Branch and Labor-Health and Human Services bills.

The Senate Appropriations Committee will not begin taking up its spending bills until June 14.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.