Watchdog: Projects in Iraq at risk for fraud, waste and abuse

The U.S. position in Iraq is ripe for fraud, waste and abuse, in part because of a heavy reliance on defense contractors despite poor visibility into their numbers and ineffective management, according to the top congressional auditor.

In January testimony before the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense, released this week in an unclassified form, Government Accountability Office chief David M. Walker told lawmakers that in the midst of a deteriorating security situation, the Defense Department is vulnerable to misspending.

"DoD's heavy reliance on contractors in Iraq, its long-standing contract and contract management problems, and poor security conditions provide opportunities for fraud, waste and abuse," Walker testified.

The government is vulnerable in part because Defense Department leaders do not have an accurate accounting of the number of people employed under U.S. contracts in Iraq. As an example, Walker cited a commander's estimate that the Army pays about $43 million per year for free meals provided to contractors who also receive per diem payments.

About a year ago the Army Central Command and the international forces in Iraq called for a census of contractors working in theater. But last October, the Defense Central Command gave up on compiling an accurate head count, citing difficulties in data collection.

Rep. Marty Meehan, D-Mass., chairman of the House Armed Services Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, said this week during a hearing on the use of contractors in Iraq that Defense had nearly 127,000 contractors at last count. A staff member said it was not clear whether that figure includes subcontractors.

In his report to lawmakers, Walker said Defense also lacks clear guidance on the use of support contractors. He said problems with defining contract requirements shift additional risk to the government, and that a dearth of contract oversight personnel prevents the department from ensuring that work stays on track.

Walker also cited training as a problem that "hinders the ability of military commanders to adequately plan for the use of contractor support and inhibits the ability of contract oversight personnel to manage and oversee contracts and contractors in Iraq."

On Thursday, the Office of Management and Budget announced a new certification for project and program managers that is designed to ensure they have the necessary skills to work with acquisition personnel in defining and managing contracts. But Defense is exempt on the grounds that the department already has a similar program in place.

Paul Denett, who leads OMB's procurement policy office, said in an interview that Defense officials would watch the new certification program closely for aspects that could be integrated into the department's approach. Denett said the Defense strategy is heavily tilted toward senior managers, who get extensive acquisition training through a dedicated academic program, while those at the more junior levels receive less instruction than is envisioned for civilian agencies.

In his testimony, Walker also said Congress cannot know the severity of the security situation in Iraq without better information about the preparedness of Iraqi troops.

Defense develops "transition readiness assessments" on Iraqi units' training progress. Walker said in January that he was close to reaching an agreement with Defense leadership on gaining access to those reports. But a GAO spokesman said Friday they have not been turned over.

Stuart Bowen, special inspector general for Iraq reconstruction, has said the reconstruction effort is prone to waste, but has not experienced much fraud since a crackdown in 2004.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.