Senators to meet on immigration reform

As the May 14 date for a Senate immigration floor debate looms closer, negotiations on a bipartisan bill remain fluid, and some aides and lobbyists are questioning whether it will be ready in time.

GOP aides said bipartisan staff talks broke down last week because of a misunderstanding on how Democrats would handle a set of Republican principles. Republican and Democratic senators are scheduled to meet again Tuesday, which could give them the opportunity to settle the dispute and begin drafting legislation.

There is no agreement on core issues such as whether illegal immigrants can earn citizenship without leaving the country or whether family-based immigration should be limited to children and spouses, ending so-called chain migration. But Democratic and Republican aides said the talks continue in good faith.

On Friday, 15 Republican senators wrote to Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., to ask for one week to review any immigration legislation before it goes to the floor. The letter was spearheaded by Sen. Jim DeMint of South Carolina. Signatories included Sens. John Cornyn of Texas, Sam Brownback of Kansas and Jeff Sessions of Alabama, who were involved in the immigration debate last year.

Brownback, the sole signatory who voted for the Senate bill last year, is less involved in the current negotiations. Cornyn has been heavily involved in talks about a bipartisan measure this year, but he is uncertain that he ultimately will support the Senate bill, according to aides.

The administration and supporters of last year's Senate bills are pinning their hopes on Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., although Kyl's involvement is more aligned with the administration's latest proposals and less with a broad bipartisan bill, according to sources.

One GOP aide said the purpose of the DeMint letter is to emphasize "minority rights" in a complicated debate. Last year, even though the immigration bill was on the Senate floor for several weeks, lawmakers were still uncertain what it contained on final passage.

Last year's bill changed dramatically from the committee-passed measure so senators would lift their objections to a floor debate. Republicans are worried that a similar circumstance could occur this year, and their anxiety is heightened by the increasingly likely prospect that the bill will go directly to the floor without committee consideration.

"Even those who are close to the discussions don't know what's shaped up," the aide said.

A Democratic leadership aide declined to comment on whether Reid would make the legislative text available before the floor debate. But, the aide pointed out that both Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff and Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez have devoted considerable time to discussing an immigration bill with Republicans and Democrats over the last several months.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.