Guard chief touts unit readiness but acknowledges stress

The chief of the Pentagon's National Guard Bureau sought to assure lawmakers Wednesday that all Guard units will receive adequate training and equipment for combat deployments, despite what he called a "death spiral of capability" affecting the forces that remain at home.

During a lively exchange Wednesday with members of the Senate Defense Appropriations Subcommittee, Lt. Gen. Steven Blum said he would delay deployments of his forces if he did not feel they were ready for combat.

"Make no mistake about this: No soldier, no unit for the National Guard will go to war unready," Blum said. "It won't happen."

His statements came just days after the Pentagon announced it would send four Guard brigades to Iraq in December -- a decision Blum acknowledged he was partially responsible for.

While the chief, known for his candor, emphasized the Guard was up to the task of continued combat missions, he also acknowledged that ongoing deployments would exacerbate equipment problems at home. On average, states have only 40 percent of their Army Guard equipment.

The Ohio Army National Guard has the most gear on hand -- 65 percent, Blum said. By comparison, the Maryland National Guard, which will soon send 1,400 troops to Iraq, has only 35 percent of its equipment and will send more of it to Iraq for the impending rotation, Blum said.

"It'll go lower," said Blum, a former commanding general of the Maryland Guard. The National Guard estimates that it needs an additional $40 billion over the next six years -- on top of the billions already planned for the Army and Air Guard -- to get its units combat ready.

"I think what's been presented here amounts to a national crisis," said Sen. Barbara Mikulski, D-Md.

During the hearing, Majority Whip Richard Durbin, D-Ill., questioned how units bereft of equipment just before deployment could mobilize quickly for combat overseas.

"You are telling me that the equipment shortfalls not only diminish their ability to respond to a domestic crisis, it diminishes their ability to train," Durbin said. "So if all of this is true and these shortfalls can be documented, to say that each of these units is ready is to suggest some miraculous change between your statistics, which show they don't have the equipment, and their readiness to go into combat."

Blum replied that it is a "matter of applying resources against time" and giving Guard forces enough time to prepare for their missions before deploying. Durbin questioned whether the military is pushing the Guard and Reserves to the "absolute limit."

Blum acknowledged the stress on his force, but argued that the military is watching this very carefully. "Can the force be broken? Yes." Blum said. "Are we broken today? No."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.