Navy resists offers of more ships, submarines for 2008

Navy leaders on Wednesday found themselves in the awkward position of resisting generous offers by supporters in Congress to add five ships to the service's fiscal 2008 budget, arguing at a Senate hearing that the shipbuilding industry would be unable to meet the increased orders.

Their resistance set up a potential clash between the Navy and many of its traditional allies on Capitol Hill, especially some senior House lawmakers, who want to significantly boost purchases of ships next year to breathe life into the increasingly anemic U.S. shipbuilding industry.

"We're very concerned about the industrial base's limitations," Navy Secretary Donald Winter told reporters after testifying before the Senate Defense Appropriations Subcommittee. "The need and the availability of funding have got to get matched to the capacity of the industrial base."

The country's few remaining domestic shipbuilders have struggled through many lean financial years, during which investments in facilities and workers often were sub-par. Problems at some shipbuilding facilities, Winter added, were exacerbated by Hurricane Katrina, which ravaged the Gulf Coast in 2005 and particularly affected Northrop Grumman's Ingalls shipyard in Pascagoula, Miss.

But shipbuilding enthusiasts who have been clamoring for years for more Navy ship orders to turn the struggling sector around are likely to dismiss the Navy's claims that the industrial base cannot meet a sharp upturn in orders.

"You need to raise the shipbuilding rate and sustain a higher rate. We need to do that to rebuild the fleet, period," said Cynthia Brown, president of the American Shipbuilding Association. Continuing "very low rates of procurement," Brown added, will only keep the industry "fragile."

But Navy officials say the industry and the military still must take several steps -- including stabilizing the long-range shipbuilding plan and investing in the facilities and workforce -- before they can tackle more orders than already planned.

In its fiscal 2008 budget, the Navy proposed buying seven new ships for $14.4 billion -- $3.2 billion above fiscal 2007 figures.

"We are in an up-ramp," Chief of Naval Operations Michael Mullen said after the hearing. But they are not ramping up fast enough for some lawmakers.

House Armed Services Seapower and Expeditionary Forces Subcommittee Chairman Gene Taylor, D-Miss., and House Defense Appropriations Subcommittee Chairman John Murtha, D-Pa., are talking about adding five ships to the fiscal 2008 defense authorization and appropriations bills. Lawmakers are considering two more destroyers and may throw in advanced procurement money to buy a second Virginia-class submarine in 2010 -- two years earlier than the Navy planned to begin buying two subs a year.

Adding the submarine money, in particular, would be "very destabilizing," Mullen said, because it would commit the Navy to additional submarine funding in fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010.

"I've got to find the money," Mullen said. "The question then gets asked, 'Are you going to fill in this bathtub?" But Mullen said the service could most likely support accelerating purchases of the T-AKE dry cargo carrier. The Navy now plans to buy one T-AKE ship a year over the next five years.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.