Mayors vent over changes in homeland security grants

A gathering of frustrated U.S. mayors grilled Bush administration officials Friday about federal homeland security initiatives.

The mayors told officials that recent changes in homeland security grants were inflexible, confusing and cumbersome.

"That's our problem in dealing with you," said Baltimore Mayor Martin O'Malley, a Democrat who added that the amounts of cuts in homeland security grants over recent years would result in the grant programs being "eliminated by 2009."

The mayors also called on Homeland Security officials to increase funding for communication equipment, transit and rail systems, ports, air cargo screening, among other items.

Homeland Security Secretary Chertoff earlier this month announced that the urban area grant initiative would move from funding for the 50 largest cities to a regional approach.

The change triggered an outcry from governors and mayors who said they would have to work across jurisdictions in a tight time frame to apply for the funding. On Friday the mayors called on the Homeland Security Department to clearly outline the administration's priorities for the money so city officials can better compete for limited dollars.

Tracy Henke, the department's executive director of grants and training, conceded that the department has yet to figure out how to measure preparedness, but said it was a priority for the department.

She also told the mayors that President Bush is not solely to blame for decreased spending, but that Congress shares the responsibility. She also vowed improved clarity and transparency for city and state officials before the March 2 deadline for funding applications.

Following the homeland security session, the U.S. Conference of Mayors heard sympathetic remarks from Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., who said the Republican White House has made "wrong choices" on security issues.

"Wrong choices in Washington have left mayors with bigger burdens and unpaid bill," he said, contending that Democrats tried to increase funding levels for homeland security grants but were "rejected" last year.

The minority leader also criticized the administration for its decision to cut the National Guard, which state and local officials depend on for catastrophes.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.