Pentagon inspector general interviewing ex-acquisitions chief

The Pentagon inspector general's office is interviewing a key player in the corrupt Air Force tanker lease deal after fielding heavy criticism from the Senate Armed Services Committee for failing to do so during its investigation.

Senate Armed Services Chairman John Warner, R-Va., who criticized the inspector general for not using his subpoena powers to get the interview, directly contacted former Pentagon acquisition chief Edward (Pete) Aldridge and urged him to sit down with investigators.

"He is quite willing and the IG is presumably in the process of getting it done as we speak," Warner told CongressDaily Thursday.

A source said one interview with the retired acquisition chief already has occurred in Florida.

During the tanker investigation, Aldridge ignored telephone calls and registered mail notices sent from the inspector general's office, Inspector General Joseph Schmitz said during a hearing on the issue earlier this month.

Aldridge is one of a handful of top Pentagon officials considered by the inspector general to be central to the overpriced, $23.5 billion lease deal, which has resulted in the resignation of two Air Force leaders and the incarceration of two senior Boeing executives.

The 256-page tanker investigation report, released earlier this month, names Aldridge as one of the "primary decision makers" in the Defense Department who allowed the proposed deal to move forward.

Aldridge signed off on the lease as one of his last acts in office in May 2003, without the customary review by the Defense Acquisition Board and before the Pentagon's leasing review panel concluded its own study, according to the IG report. The leasing panel ultimately recommended buying -- not leasing -- the tankers.

Aldridge also justified the more expensive lease option, stating that the Air Force urgently needed to replace its aging fleet of KC-135 tankers, and could get the airframes faster through a lease deal than a traditional procurement. Inspectors concluded that the need had been overstated, according to the report.

"This is an enormous case," Warner told Schmitz at the hearing this month. "It has enormous ramifications throughout the whole procurement process, impact on the military, and I think you should have utilized the subpoena."

The lack of any interviews with Aldridge became central to public discussions on the report and drew quick criticism not only from Warner, but also Armed Services ranking member Carl Levin, D-Mich., and Airland Subcommittee Chairman John McCain, R-Ariz.

At one point during the hearing, McCain urged Warner to subpoena Aldridge to testify before the committee, but the chairman disagreed, stating he would prefer to first invite him to appear voluntarily.

McCain, the driving force in the Senate behind the tanker investigation, is expected to hold an Airland Subcommittee hearing on the issue, sources have said.

Meanwhile, McCain and other leaders on the committee also are attempting to resolve another lingering issue clouding the IG investigation: the hefty portion of heavily redacted material, essentially shielding Bush administration officials, members of Congress and others from public blame.

McCain said Thursday that he is discussing with Warner and Levin how to "find a way" to get the information, much of which is closed even to lawmakers and staffers with security clearance.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.