Overseas basing panel concerned about pace of relocations

Members of the Overseas Basing Commission Tuesday reiterated their concern that the Defense Department is moving too quickly in its plans to move nearly 70,000 troops stationed abroad to domestic military installations by the end of the decade.

At issue is whether the Pentagon can work quickly enough to prepare housing and training sites for the influx of troops, and whether the military has adequate air and sea lift to transport soldiers from the United States to foreign hot spots, members told the Senate Military Construction and Veterans Affairs Appropriations Subcommittee.

Meanwhile, a quick move -- mostly from Germany and the Korean peninsula -- might cost $20 billion or more and "adversely impact the services' ability to adequately fund modernization and transformation," commission Chairman Al Cornella told the panel.

Commissioners also warned that a hasty relocation might hinder recruitment and retention efforts, which have already faced serious challenges because of recurring deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan.

Subcommittee ranking member Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., echoed many of the commissioners' fears and also noted that the Pentagon had not given enough thought to foreign policy, or to its "overreaching objectives," before preparing for the move.

Subcommittee Chairwoman Kay Bailey Hutchison, R-Texas, however, stated that delaying the move would postpone modernization efforts and the Army's transformation into a more nimble, brigade-based force.

In a "perfect world," military members and families would face no quality-of-life interruptions during the transfer back to the United States, but the impact of a delay on future plans would have even more devastating effects, she said.

Meanwhile, Pentagon officials contended that they have worked with the State Department on their overseas basing plan and have addressed foreign policy concerns with 20 nations.

Ryan Henry, the principal deputy undersecretary of Defense for policy, added that deploying troops from the United States for overseas contingencies, rather than directly from Europe or Asia, would not add any risk to operational and deployment plans.

"Uncertainty is part of the strategy landscape which we have had in the post-9/11 world," Henry said.

He added that the Pentagon will have a better idea of its strategic air- and sea-lift needs early next year, when it completes its massive Quadrennial Defense Review of military capabilities, force structure and plans.

Congress created the six-member overseas commission in 2004 to provide an objective, independent analysis of the Pentagon's global base posture plans. The commission submitted a preliminary report to Congress and the Defense Department in May, and will file its final report by Aug. 15.

Subcommittee members also voiced concerns about the overall cost of moving troops from overseas.

The Pentagon estimated that total costs could range from $9 billion to $12 billion, but a Government Accountability Office evaluation put the price tag at closer to $20 billion, much of which will come from the services' operations and maintenance spending accounts.

Defense officials told the commission that the total cost could come to $25 billion, Cornella said. And, while it is "logical to assume" that relocating troops to the United States might save some money in the long run, the savings might not amount to much because the military would have to replicate many of the facilities in Europe in the United States, he added.

"We just can't pretend we can do all of this with minimal-to-no cost," said Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La.

If adequate funds are not set aside for the troop transfer and the Pentagon sticks to its current schedule, it "could drive unforeseen consequences," noted commission Vice Chairman Lewis Curtis.

But despite several concerns about the Pentagon's timetable, the effects on military quality of life and the services' lift capabilities, commissioners stressed that they largely agree with the premise for the Pentagon's global basing changes and its desire to relocate troops.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

    Download
  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

    Download
  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

    Download
  • GBC Issue Brief: The Future of 9-1-1

    A Look Into the Next Generation of Emergency Services

    Download
  • GBC Survey Report: Securing the Perimeters

    A candid survey on cybersecurity in state and local governments

    Download
  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.

    Download
  • eBook: State & Local Cybersecurity

    CenturyLink is committed to helping state and local governments meet their cybersecurity challenges. Towards that end, CenturyLink commissioned a study from the Government Business Council that looked at the perceptions, attitudes and experiences of state and local leaders around the cybersecurity issue. The results were surprising in a number of ways. Learn more about their findings and the ways in which state and local governments can combat cybersecurity threats with this eBook.

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.