Army defends plans to centralize National Guard centers

Members of the Defense Base Realignment and Closure Commission pressed senior Army officials Wednesday on what one member described as the "Field of Dreams" approach to consolidating reserve and National Guard personnel at Armed Forces Reserve Centers.

Samuel Skinner, a chief of staff for former President Bush, questioned the Army's plan to "build a world-class training center and hope that the Guard will come."

As part of the 2005 BRAC round, the Pentagon invited state adjutants general to submit recommendations for the locations of these new reserve centers being built on federal and National Guard land.

Craig College, the Army's deputy assistant secretary for infrastructure analysis, said the Army expects that these "centers of excellence" will be larger, unconstrained by encroaching development and technologically advanced over existing reserve and Guard installations.

Other commission members wondered if the plan to close 211 reserve and Guard facilities while building 125 centers, would hurt recruiting and retention because soldiers will have to commute greater distances. Army Secretary Francis Harvey acknowledged that the impact is a concern, particularly at a time when the service is struggling to meet recruitment and retention goals. Harvey and Army Chief of Staff Peter Schoomaker emphasized that the plan is backed by many states, and that the consolidated centers would add no more than 50 miles to soldiers' commutes.

The bid to reshape the Army's domestic infrastructure is part of the Defense Department's recommendations released Friday to close or realign more than 800 military installations in the United States. The list includes roughly 400 Army installations, comprised in part of 176 Army Reserve and 387 Army National Guard facilities.

The Army portion of the base-closing recommendations was the topic of today's commission hearing. If the recommendations are implemented, the Army expects to save $7.6 billion over the next several years, followed by $1.5 billion in annual recurring savings over the next two decades. The cost of these closures is estimated at about $12 billion.

Harvey said that while the closing of overseas bases and the return of U.S. troops to domestic installations also will cost money -- roughly $800 million -- the combined effort will generate more than $20 billion in savings. The Army expects to return 47,000 troops, including 11,000 to Fort Bliss, Texas, as part of the global restructuring plan. BRAC commissioners have less than four months to evaluate the Pentagon's recommendations and submit its list to the White House by Sept. 8. The commission continues to await the department's release of thousands of pages of supporting documents detailing the rationale behind its base closure decisions. Members expect to see the documents Friday.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by Brocade

    Best of 2016 Federal Forum eBook

    Earlier this summer, Federal and tech industry leaders convened to talk security, machine learning, network modernization, DevOps, and much more at the 2016 Federal Forum. This eBook includes a useful summary highlighting the best content shared at the 2016 Federal Forum to help agencies modernize their network infrastructure.

  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    GBC Flash Poll Series: Merger & Acquisitions

    Download this GBC Flash Poll to learn more about federal perspectives on the impact of industry consolidation.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    A DevOps Roadmap for the Federal Government

    This GBC Report discusses how DevOps is steadily gaining traction among some of government's leading IT developers and agencies.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.

  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    Joint Enterprise Licensing Agreements

    Read this eBook to learn how defense agencies can achieve savings and efficiencies with an Enterprise Software Agreement.

  • Sponsored by Cloudera

    Government Forum Content Library

    Get all the essential resources needed for effective technology strategies in the federal landscape.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.