Officials criticize system for tracking foreign students

A system intended to track foreign students has been improved since its 2003 inception, but personnel issues are causing delays and potentially deterring students from pursuing degrees in the United States, witnesses at a joint hearing of two House subcommittees warned Thursday.

The Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS), operated by the Homeland Security Department, was created as part of a 2001 anti-terrorism law known as the USA PATRIOT Act. It was initially plagued by technical mishaps but since has been improved, according to the department and the Government Accountability Office.

"Indications are that SEVIS performance has improved and continues to improve," Randolph Hite, director of GAO's information technology architecture and systems issues, said at the hearing of the House Education and the Workforce Select Education and 21st-Century Competitiveness subcommittees.

Hite criticized "residual help-desk problems," which can cause delays when students are attempting to obtain visas. He stopped short, however, of blaming SEVIS entirely for the declining number of international students.

That decline can partly be attributed to growing higher education competition abroad, said C.D. Mote, president of the University of Maryland. "U.S. schools have not been aggressive in pursuing international students" because the nation traditionally has dominated in graduate education. "That game has changed entirely and our country has not understood that completely," he said. "We have to be more effective in our competition."

"Those seeking to study in science and engineering [have faced] major delays in receiving their visas because of security clearances," said Dale Kildee of Michigan, the ranking Democrat on the 21st-Century Competitiveness Subcommittee. "We have to redouble our efforts to process [visas] more quickly. The potential impact is huge" if students decide to study elsewhere.

The United States should preserve its flow of talented international students into the country while also maintaining adequate safeguards against potential terrorists, said subcommittee Chairman Howard (Buck) McKeon, R-Calif.

Victor Cerda, special counsel for immigration and customs enforcement at Homeland Security, said his department organized SEVIS "in a manner to meet that balance" between education opportunities and security. "By no means is this a done deal," he added. "We continue to work with the universities and the Department of State, but there's always room for improvement."

Homeland Security is particularly concerned about the "overall integrity of the information in SEVIS," Cerda said. As a result, the department is "working toward an overall data integrity strategy" and the student and exchange visitor program is "considering the establishment of a federal advisory committee specifically focused on performance," he said.

Mote echoed GAO's concern about personnel. University staff are not allowed to correct errors entered into SEVIS and must ask federal authorities before making changes.

"The correction can take months, and often students graduate before the 'fix' occurs," he said. "SEVIS should qualify a designated school official at each institution to correct technical errors and report the changes on a specific schedule."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.