Pentagon blames Air Force Academy leaders for sexual misconduct scandal

Pentagon officials on Tuesday placed the blame for the Air Force Academy's sexual assault scandal last year on a failed chain of command that involved eight high-ranking officials who did not recognize the severity of the problem.

Over the past 10 years, those officials failed to fix the culture that led to the abuses, did not act as good role models, failed to give enough attention to those under their command, and failed to guard against sexual misconduct among cadets, according to a new report from Defense Department Inspector General Joseph Schmitz.

The IG report was accompanied by a report from Air Force Inspector General Steven Polk that detailed four instances in which Air Force Academy officials did not follow established procedures.

The long-awaited reports are the culmination of an investigation that began when several current and former female Air Force Academy cadets came forward in February 2003 with sexual assault charges. They said they were advised not to report the incidents.

Since then, academy leaders have been replaced, and investigations into the scandal, which involved more than 50 cadets, have spread across the entire military community.

At a press conference Tuesday, Defense Undersecretary for Personnel and Readiness David Chu said the reports are evidence of a history of sexual assault in the armed services. "It is not a proud history, but it is a history from which we must learn," Chu said.

One of the most visible changes at the academy is the removal of a sign that stated "Bring Me Men" near its entrance.

Chu said that one of the most crucial issues is establishing a policy for victim confidentiality. "We have learned that providing confidentiality to victims will actually increase the probability that cases will be reported, cases that are currently unknown to us," he said.

Chu said the Pentagon will establish a policy of confidential reporting by Jan. 1 that will help sexual assault victims and improve the "climate for reporting incidents of assault."

Schmitz said in a memorandum that he disagrees "with changes which address confidentiality concerns without simultaneously ensuring timely and effective involvement by law enforcement."

Civilian experts on victims of sexual assault said they are awaiting the specifics of the Pentagon's new policy.

"We're anticipating what the details will be," said Anita Sanchez, spokeswoman for the Miles Foundation, a nonprofit group that assists military service members who are victims of sexual assault. "This is only the second time that the U.S. armed forces have acknowledged that there is a serious problem with sexual assault … there has been an acknowledgement in the failures of the system--or, as the military calls it, the leadership."

Sanchez said that the Pentagon's verbal promise of confidentiality Tuesday might be enough to encourage more victims to come forward and report instances of sexual misconduct.

The Miles Foundation has received 273 reports of sexual assault in Iraq, Kuwait, Afghanistan and Bahrain, of which 199 are from the Army, 32 from the Navy, 45 from the Air Force, 67 from the Marines and 10 from the Coast Guard.

Militarywide policy changes are due by the end of the year, which would include a confidentiality policy, under a congressional order in fiscal 2005 Defense authorization legislation.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.