Pentagon official: We need new security technologies

For the nation's security agencies to realize their vision of a secure America extending well beyond its borders, the private sector must deliver an array of new and existing security technologies, a top Defense Department official said Tuesday.

"To win the war on terror, we must look to our private sector, specifically our high-tech industry," Paul McHale, assistant Defense secretary for homeland defense, told a homeland security conference sponsored by E.J. Krause and Associates.

McHale, whose office bridges the gap between Defense and the Homeland Security Department, said the vision is to push the U.S. borders out, using the country's technological advantage to "shape the battle space" and keep terrorists off balance. Protecting the nation requires identifying terrorist threats well before they reach U.S. ports, he said.

An entirely new nautical surveillance approach is likely within six months, he said. It will use the latest ship-based systems and unmanned aerial vehicles to prevent threats by sea.

McHale identified several areas of technological need to fulfill the vision. The government must be able to detect radiological, biological, chemical and other types of threats, and "first responders" to emergencies and other workers must have adequate protection through suits or other mechanisms, he said.

In addition, the private sector needs to create better non-lethal weapons to protect critical infrastructure, the vast majority of which is said to be in private hands. Authorities also need affordable communications equipment that is compatible with other systems, superior shoulder-launched missile defenses, and better equipment for extracting people from disaster sites. Right now, he said, injured people still would have to be removed on plastic sleds.

New surveillance systems are needed, McHale said. Biometric technology, which scans faces, hands or other physical attributes for identities, is critical to the government's vision for security, he added. Appropriate attention must be paid to U.S. citizens' privacy, he said, adding that much of the technology likely will be deployed overseas.

Also at the event, Tom DiLenge, majority chief counsel at the House Homeland Security Committee, said there has been "very little oversight" in Congress of critical infrastructure assets from a strategic perspective. At times, he said, there have been "pseudo debates," such as the one following the Northeast electricity blackout last year.

DiLenge said he is "very optimistic" that the committee will be made permanent after this year but said the debate continues over transferring jurisdiction from other committees.

The issue is expected to be high on the agenda of the House Republican Conference next week, he said. Jurisdictional agreements are still being resolved with the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, which governs emergency services, Coast Guard and aviation security, and with the Judiciary Committee, which oversees border security and immigration issues.

Top priorities for the committee next year, should it survive, would be cyber security, encouraging the development and acquisition of anti-terrorism technologies, and restructuring state and local anti-terrorism aid on the basis of risk assessments, he said. The department must finish assessing critical infrastructure risks in December.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.