TSA executive bonus program draws fire

A report this week that the Transportation Security Administration gave disproportionately large bonuses to executives compared to lower-level workers has prompted a flurry of criticism.

The Homeland Security Department's inspector general reported this week that TSA doled out about $1.45 million in bonuses at the end of 2003 to 88 executives. The report concluded that the average TSA award was about $16,500, which was higher than awards given out by any other agency.

In December 2003, TSA distributed monetary awards to executives ranging from $10,000 to $20,000 each, according to a list of the bonuses obtained by Government Executive. Stephen McHale, who resigned as the agency's deputy administrator in July, received a cash bonus of $20,000. David Stone, now the agency's chief, got $17,500. Stone served as a federal security director at Los Angeles International Airport until August 2003, when he became the agency's deputy chief of staff.

According to the Office of Personnel Management, 76 percent of TSA executives received a cash performance award. Of the almost 51,000 nonexecutive TSA employees, about 3 percent received an award or pay increase.

TSA officials defended the awards, saying the bonus program followed all laws and regulations and covered a two-year work period. "Given the hours and productivity of the workforce during this critical period, TSA believes the award expenditures were fully justified," agency spokesman Mark Hatfield said in a news release.

The agency, however, was unable to provide reliable or comprehensive data for awards given to employees in nonexecutive grades, the IG said. The data "suggests that a substantial inequity exists in [TSA's] performance recognition program between executive and nonexecutive employees," the IG wrote.

Several TSA screeners expressed anger at the IG's report.

"The majority of the monetary awards should have gone to TSA screeners, leads and supervisors based on their percentage of the TSA workforce," said a former screener. "That is what is called fair and equitable."

A screener from Newark International Airport in New Jersey called the bonuses "appalling" because they disproportionately went to executives.

A TSA official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said that it does not appear that all executives who got a bonus had been with the agency for the two-year period the agency cited.

According to OPM, an average of 49 percent of executives at all federal agencies received cash awards in fiscal 2002, the latest year for which statistics are available. At TSA, 76 percent of executives received a cash performance award related to their fiscal 2002-2003 performance.

TSA did not spend the total amount it was authorized to award in bonuses, however, the IG found. The agency's fiscal 2003 award pool was $1.85 million, meaning that about $400,000 was not spent. TSA also stayed within executive performance award limitations, even though the agency was not legally obligated to, the IG said.

TSA said it is "inaccurate and misleading" to compare its bonuses to those given by much larger, Cabinet-level departments. The agency added that its executives are not eligible for the Presidential Rank Award, the government's highest award for civil servants.

Data showed that TSA distributed 2,001 performance awards and pay increases to 1,423 nonexecutive employees from August 2002 through February 2004. Out of 50,878 nonexecutive employees within the agency, only 3 percent received an award or pay increase.

"Compared to the 76 percent of eligible [executive] employees who received a monetary performance award, there is a wide disparity in the percentage of nonexecutive employees who received monetary awards," the IG wrote.

The IG also found that 38 percent of executives who received awards had no individual recommendation or justification. Their personnel files did not contain, as part of the performance evaluation process, a narrative showing how they met performance goals. Instead, boilerplate language was used repeatedly without change to address how the executives met or exceeded performance expectations.

TSA officials said the use of identical language for performance awards for federal security directors and assistant federal security directors was justified because both positions--regardless of location--have the same duties and responsibilities of providing day-to-day operational direction for federal security at U.S. airports.

The IG concluded, however, that boilerplate language defeats the purpose of an awards program that is intended to recognize and reward individual performance that surpasses that of colleagues.

TSA acknowledged that its "program infrastructure" for the first awards cycle was "inadequate." The agency said improvements will be made in the preparation and review of documentation to support bonuses in the coming years, as well as to provide equitable treatment to all employees.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

    Download
  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

    Download
  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

    Download
  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

    Download
  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.