Senate aide predicts fractured Homeland Security oversight

Senate oversight of the Homeland Security Department likely will continue to be fractured during the 109th Congress, despite recent legislative maneuvers and the approval of funding for the department, a key budget aide said Tuesday.

Bill Hoagland, the director of budget and appropriations for Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., said that if negotiations between the House and the Senate on legislation designed to overhaul the intelligence community are completed, it is not likely to seriously affect the current overlapping jurisdictions on security issues in the legislative branch.

Hoagland spoke at a briefing on security financing sponsored by Equity International.

Negotiators on a Senate plan for security jurisdiction have established that the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee will oversee much of Homeland Security. But the Transportation Security Administration and Coast Guard will remain within the jurisdiction of the Commerce Committee, and the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center in Georgia and Secret Service will be handled by the Judiciary Committee, Hoagland said.

The House established a special Homeland Security Committee. It is set to go out of business at the end of the 108th Congress, but House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., has indicated support for making the panel permanent.

Adding to the problem of oversight is the increasingly political nature of homeland security funding, Hoagland said. "Immediately after [the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks], there was a sense of bipartisanship," he said. But with the significant increase in resources for interested parties, "it should be obvious to all that homeland security has become more politically charged."

"Both sides have used the talk of danger in an effort to win votes," he said. "I'm not totally naive to the politics of this town and, more importantly, the separation of power. [But] this politicalization of homeland security cannot but add to the anxiety to the American public about their safety."

Hoagland also said it is "not my responsibility to question" allocations for Homeland Security in fiscal 2005. But he did note that "despite the tremendous resources that have been devoted [to homeland security], it is clear that our borders remain porous" and that lawmakers need to pay attention to them as closely as they pay attention to the nation's airport gates.

Andrew Maner, the chief financial officer for the department, said Congress was "very generous" with its funding for airport-screening technology, but he said the department is working to reduce its immigration backlog, a process that likely will continue for several more budget cycles.

The department is "very well-funded, [so] it is up to us to spend this money wisely," Maner said. He acknowledged, when questioned, that there are "certainly things we can do to improve."

Financial management is "a journey," he said, so Homeland Security is taking the criticism it received in its first year and attempting to improve. Those improvements include enhancing the process for allocating funding for state and local emergency responders, a process that is "never fast enough," he said.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.