Naming of interim cyber chief not the solution, industry says

The naming of an interim director for cybersecurity at the Homeland Security Department would not resolve larger problems of how the issue is addressed in the federal government, industry sources said Wednesday.

Sources said the department internally circulated the announcement Tuesday that Donald "Andy" Purdy, the deputy director of the department's cybersecurity division, soon will be named to replace former director Amit Yoran, who resigned on short notice last week.

Paul Kurtz, executive director of the Cyber Security Industry Alliance and a former presidential adviser on critical infrastructure protection, worked with Purdy in the White House during the development of the February 2003 National Strategy to Secure Cyberspace. He praised Purdy but said, "I think the focus should be on the position, not the incumbent."

"So often in Washington, it's the perch from which you sit and the authority you have," he said. Authority, control over budgets and access to senior administration officials are key to getting things done, he said. "The way it's structured now, I don't see that happening," Kurtz added. "You could put a lot of people in that spot and it won't happen."

Kurtz echoed others in industry in supporting a provision now in the House intelligence reform bill that would elevate cybersecurity two levels within the department, from the current rank of director up to assistant secretary.

Kurtz argued that the department's concern that elevating the position would separate the protection of physical and cyber infrastructures is not logical because both areas still would be overseen by the undersecretary for information analysis and infrastructure protection.

He said that the nature of cybersecurity is "wholly different" from physical security and that moving cyber security beside physical security, instead of under it, would improve the ability to focus on physical security. Currently, the cybersecurity director reports to the assistant secretary for infrastructure protection.

Another information security source said Purdy is not well-known to industry. Besides Yoran, a former Symantec executive, past cybersecurity leaders in the administration have included White House cybersecurity "czar" Richard Clarke and Howard Schmidt, former co-chair of the White House Critical Infrastructure Protection Board. The source said Purdy is "just not in their league."

Trained as a lawyer, Purdy previously served on the president's critical infrastructure board focused on information security and privacy. Before that, he served as acting general counsel for the U.S. Sentencing Commission, and on the House Ethics Committee and the House select committee that investigated President John F. Kennedy's assassination. He also was a producer for NBC News and CBS News.

Purdy filled in for Yoran at a Wednesday forum on the common criteria being developed for information security. He did not discuss Yoran's departure but outlined department activities and called for industry to do more to protect information. He said there would be a greater focus on a national cybersecurity strategy "in the weeks and months ahead."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.