Policymakers preach patience in intelligence reform

Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Acting CIA Director John McLaughlin on Tuesday hesitated to fully support the immediate creation of a national intelligence post.

A national director "could conceivably lead to some efficiencies in some aspects of intelligence collection and some modest but indefinable improvement in the support those agencies provide to other elements of the government," Rumsfeld told the Senate Armed Services Committee.

But he urged lawmakers to make sure that the possible consolidation of the National Security Agency, the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency and the National Reconnaissance Office outside of the Defense Department would "help resolve the intelligence-related problems and difficulties we face and not create additional problems."

McLaughlin, meanwhile, called for patience in determining what to change in the intelligence community. "I believe that short, clear line of command and control are required in whatever structure you establish, regardless of what you call its leader," he said.

Intelligence reform will require "flexibility in shifting resources, people and money to respond to shifting priorities," McLaughlin said. Therefore, if a national intelligence director is named, "that individual should have the clear authority to move people and resources and to evaluate the performance of national intelligence agencies and their leaders."

McLaughlin stressed that former CIA Director George Tenet's statement saying it would take five more years for the intelligence community to be fully secure was "misinterpreted." Tenet was "not saying that we are starting now [but that] we probably need about five more years to get to where we need to be," McLaughlin said. "You have to appreciate where we started from."

He also assured members that the CIA is "close to fixing" the problem of getting pertinent information directly to top officials rather than going through the entire chain of command. "Some version of a national counter-terrorism center would help" that goal, he said.

Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Richard Myers urged Congress and officials not to "create any institutional barriers" as they move forward. He said lawmakers should proceed cautiously "on any decision that increases centralized control" because that tends to lessen the entrepreneurial spirit seen in the military today.

Committee Chairman John Warner of Virginia warned that because of ongoing military operations overseas, "massive dismemberment" at the Defense Department "could result in turbulence that might degrade this level of intelligence so essential" to fighting terrorism. He called for lawmakers to be cautious but to strengthen the system.

Ranking Democrat Carl Levin of Michigan agreed. "We need to proceed urgently but carefully as we consider reforming out intelligence system," he said.

Levin cautioned against politicizing the debate over naming a national intelligence director, however. "Independent and objective intelligence is a matter of vital national importance," he said. "Objective, unvarnished intelligence should inform policy choices; policy should not drive intelligence assessments."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.