Lawmakers seek incentives to reduce classification of information

House lawmakers on Tuesday will begin trying to develop incentives to stop federal agencies from overclassifying material in an effort to improve information sharing across the government.

The House National Security, Emerging Threats and International Relations Subcommittee of the Government Reform Committee will hold a hearing Tuesday to examine how the "excessive designation of official secrets" is an impediment to enhanced interagency and intergovernmental information sharing recommended by the 9/11 commission.

"We have too much overclassificaiton; it's an outrage," Subcommittee Chairman. Christopher Shays, R-Conn., told Government Executive. "I will get classified briefings that are silly. They tell me nothing I don't already know, but then they prevent me from discussing what I already know."

Shays said he sometimes will avoid classified briefings altogether because afterward he is prevented from discussing material that already is in the public domain.

Witnesses scheduled to testify at the hearing include William Leonard, director of the government's Information Security Oversight Office, and Steven Aftergood, director of the Project on Government Secrecy at the Federation of American Scientists.

The 9/11 commission concluded that federal agencies are guilty of overclassifying information, which contributed to poor information-sharing prior to the Sept. 11 attacks. The panel's final report recommended that the overall budget of the intelligence community should be declassified, and sharing of information should be stressed over hoarding.

"Current security requirements nurture overclassification and excessive compartmentalization of information among agencies," the report stated.

Former New Jersey Gov. Thomas Kean, who chaired the 9/11 commission, told Congress during a hearing last week that he was "absolutely amazed and appalled" at the amount of classified information he read that was already reported in the media.

"I think this overclassification is hurting us terribly right now," Kean said. "The public is not an enemy; it's an ally in this war against terrorism. The more they know, the more they can help us. The more local law enforcement knows, the more they can help us."

Former Indiana Rep. Lee Hamilton, the commission's vice chairman, said Congress has deferred to the executive branch on classification authority too often, and needs to begin setting standards for classifying material.

Federal agencies spent about $6.5 billion in fiscal 2003 classifying information, according to an annual report released last month by the Information Security Oversight Office, which is responsible for monitoring and regulating the government's use of classification authorities. Comparatively, the government spent about $5.6 billion in fiscal 2002 on classification activities. Industry spent about $1 billion to classify information in 2003, compared to about $840 million in 2002.

If federal agencies did not classify so much material, Shays said, it would be easier for them to discern what information needs to be shared.

"There is more valuable information publicly than classified because there's just a lot more that's public," Shays added. "But if it's not classified, our intelligence community tends to not give it validity. One of the things the 9/11 commission has pointed out is that we need to integrate the public and the classified [information]; then you really will get a good picture of what's going on."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.