Former senators offer harsh assessment of nation's security

The next terrorist attack is coming and the United States is far from prepared, two former senators who are experts in the homeland security movement, said Thursday.

"Myself, my hair is on fire," said former Sen. Gary Hart, borrowing a phrase recently popularized by former White House counter-terrorism chief Richard Clarke.

"I for one think it is only a matter of time before [an attack] happens again in a devastating way," former Sen. Warren Rudman said. The two spoke at a McGraw-Hill homeland security conference.

Hart, a Colorado Democrat, and Rudman, a Republican from New Hampshire, oversaw a commission that warned of imminent terrorist attacks prior to Sept. 11, 2001. They said they tried unsuccessfully early in the administration to meet with President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney. They did meet with National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, Secretary of State Colin Powell, and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, but the ex-senators said that beyond being respectful and taking notes, little happened.

Hart urged the public and private sector attendees "not [to] fall into the Washington trap" of gauging the nation's preparation by the amount of money being spent. Hart also criticized the administration over a report that a shared database between the FBI and the Customs Service would not be operational until 2008. "That is unacceptable," he said. "We cannot wait."

Both senators said the federal government should act at home more like it is engaged in war. Hart said tax cuts should be curtailed and the private sector, which controls most of the nation's critical infrastructure, should be commanded to better secure assets under wartime conditions. "What bothers me is the rhetoric [of the administration] doesn't match the performance," he said.

Some of the Hart-Rudman report's recommendations included investing more in domestic security and in math and science education, which Hart said has not been done. They also urged the reorganization of national security, Congress and finding ways to attract the best people to government. Their recommendation to create a domestic security department initially was opposed by Bush.

Rudman criticized policy makers for being driven by events rather than foresight, and said Congress has ceded too much power to the White House. He said the government has poured money into air travel security because the attack used that means but that if the attack had come at a seaport, the spending would have been there instead.

He said the top priority should be to provide first responders basic equipment, and to allocate funding to localities based on threats, not population.

Rudman said the president's creation of the Terrorist Threat Integration Center helped unite the disparate intelligence bodies. He said he favors basic standards for chemical plants, nuclear facilities and cyber security.

Both senators said they back the establishment of House and Senate committees with permanent oversight of the new department, and said other chairmen would have to relinquish jurisdiction.

Rudman warned policy makers: "I think there will be hell to pay in this country politically if something happens."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.