House lawmakers blast security department's science chief

One year after creation of the Homeland Security Department, patience for the department's science and technology directorate appears to have run out on Capitol Hill.

Directorate chief Charles McQueary faced brusque treatment at the hands of appropriators Tuesday. "I think you can sense the level of frustration in your funding committee," said House Homeland Security Appropriations Subcommittee Chairman Harold Rogers, R-Ky.

McQueary's lack of knowledge that his office is expected to produce a review of the nation's airline security system by May provoked Rogers.

"I'm absolutely more than troubled. I'm irate," Rogers said after McQueary said he had not been approached by Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge on the issue. Rogers said that in a "heated" November meeting, Ridge had promised to direct McQueary to conduct the review because the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is to blame for continued inconveniences and risk to passengers.

"You will get back to me by the close of the secretary's day," Rogers said to McQueary. "Well, that's strike one."

But the harshest words came from Rep. Zach Wamp, R-Tenn., who attacked Maureen McCarthy, the science and technology division's research and development director. Wamp said McCarthy had promised in a meeting to offer projects valued at $40 million to $60 million to Oak Ridge Laboratory, which is in his district, but it has been offered projects totaling only $7.4 million.

"This has been a debacle under McCarthy's leadership and direction," Wamp said. "Somebody is not hearing the whole story. I'm afraid it's you, not me."

McQueary steadfastly defended McCarthy and said there is so much misunderstanding over the laboratory-selection process that it had to be modified.

"I'm very concerned about the future of this directorate" Wamp replied.

McQueary then said, "Sir, I want to tell you that not a single other member of Congress besides yourself has tried to bring pressure on me about how we spend money on the national labs."

McQueary also was criticized for his decision to stay out of the selection process for university "centers of excellence" until the final stages involving site visits, and he was pressed to say that the decision by the White House Office of Management and Budget to cut funding for the centers was not based on a detailed analysis of the security risks involved.

McQueary said that relevant entities, including the Agriculture Department, are involved in the centers selection. He said he was "stunned" to learn from Rep. Tom Latham, R-Iowa, that Agriculture officials say they have been left out of the process.

"I share Mr. Wamp's concern about the direction we're going here," Latham said. He said his district contains the top center for plant diseases but "can't even get a site visit" from the agency. "I don't get it," Latham said.

McQueary said the decisions are based on the quality of the proposals received. "Some people can write good proposals and some people can't," he said, adding that a screening process is the only way to manage the nearly 1,800 potentially eligible centers.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.