Senators see momentum to limit anti-terrorism powers

Momentum is building in the Senate for revisions to a law enacted after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks that enhanced the government's surveillance powers, supporters and critics of the law said on Tuesday during an oversight hearing.

Three Democrats and one Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee said they want to limit the surveillance elements of the law, dubbed the USA PATRIOT Act. The law also permits the detention of immigrants and monitoring of financial transactions for money laundering.

Democrats Richard Durbin of Illinois and Russell Feingold of Wisconsin, who co-sponsored a bill to curb three surveillance powers, questioned three Justice Department witnesses about the measure. The primary sponsor is Idaho Republican Larry Craig.

In addition to Craig, Democrat Patrick Leahy of Vermont also urged changes in the PATRIOT Act. He said he has bipartisan support for a related bill that would extend the four-year time limit on the surveillance powers in the law to more provisions that impact privacy and civil liberties.

Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., said the Bush administration "rides roughshod over the basic constitutional principles of the First, Fourth, Fifth and Six Amendments in order to meet the needs of law enforcement, and then insist[s] that a Second Amendment 'right' to bear arms prevails" over crime-fighting needs.

Democratic supporters of the PATRIOT Act said Attorney General John Ashcroft needs to cooperate with Congress. "The department has been less and less willing to share basic information about its activities," said Sen. Joseph Biden, D-Del.

"The administration stands to squander the new tools that this body reluctantly passed," he said. "I predict that the act will be repealed if you don't get your act together."

Kennedy, Biden and Leahy criticized Ashcroft for failing to appear at the oversight hearing and instead "barnstorming the country" to defend the PATRIOT Act and criticize the press and advocacy groups for "hysteria" about the law.

But committee Chairman Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, said Ashcroft has agreed to attend a subsequent oversight hearing and was not invited to Tuesday's, which featured Christopher Wray, head of the criminal division at Justice, and the U.S. attorneys in Chicago and Alexandria, Va.

Hatch defended the PATRIOT Act, as did Republicans Jon Kyl of Arizona and John Cornyn of Texas, and Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif. Hatch said the statute helps law enforcement combat terrorism, illegal drugs, obscenity and child pornography.

Hatch said a more limited anti-terrorism law passed after the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995 disappointed him because "some on the far right and far left prevented us from getting some of these tools that might very well have saved thousands of lives."

Asked by Kyl what provisions of the PATRIOT Act had proved most useful, Wray cited nationwide court orders, the ability for law enforcement to share information with intelligence agents, and the ability to obtain the e-mail addresses sent from and to suspects.

Feingold said he supports those powers but seeks to curb other, more objectionable provisions of the law.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.