Lawmakers air concerns about terrorism intelligence office

Members of two House committees on Tuesday posed questions about accountability issues at the government's new joint counter-terrorism intelligence analysis office, the Terrorist Threat Integration Center (TTIC).

"At this very moment, terrorists could be plotting another terrorist attack on America," said Homeland Security Committee ranking Democrat Jim Turner of Texas. "But who is in charge of making sure that any information the government might have about the plot doesn't fall through the cracks? No one knows with certainty."

"There is no clear basis for accountability," Turner continued. "One thing we do know is that the robust intelligence function of the Department of Homeland Security [laid out in the act creating the department] does not exist."

Officials from TTIC, FBI and Homeland Security testifying to the Homeland Security and Judiciary committees said by statute, the responsibility for intelligence analysis is shared between agencies, and is not solely the job of Homeland Security.

"TTIC was not created by law," said Homeland Security Committee Chairman Christopher Cox, R-Calif., referring the presidential action that established the center earlier this year. "Today we want to hear that the Department of Homeland Security is fully and unequivocally committed to bringing its Directorate of Information Analysis and Infrastructure Protection to its full, statutorily mandated, capabilities," said Cox.

Cox and other members are concerned that Homeland Security's statutory obligation to receive all of the government's raw, potentially terrorist-related information may have been undercut by the creation of the TTIC.

TTIC is a group of analysts from agencies such as Homeland Security, FBI and the CIA, who began work on May 1. The CIA director oversees it. It now has more than 100 officers drawn from the partner agencies, and will have several hundred in a year, TTIC Director John Brennan said. Over the next year, TTIC expects to have 40 Homeland Security and 30 FBI analysts.

Under pressure from Cox, who referred to the memorandum creating TTIC, Brennan and Bill Parrish, acting assistant secretary for information analysis at IAIP, acknowledged that raw information may go to TTIC first and then with human intervention, be passed on to Homeland Security if it is seen as terrorist-related. Cox said that is not consistent with the Homeland Security statute, and said Homeland Security should get raw, unanalyzed information in real time simultaneous to TTIC. But Parrish said IAIP has access to all relevant information, and assured members that the 19 statutory functions laid out in the Homeland Security Act are being implemented.

Brennan said TTIC's challenges include making it possible for technologies to communicate with each other, ensuring that sources and methods are protected, processes are streamlined and privacy rights are protected.

Jerry Berman, president of the Center for Democracy and Technology, testified that oversight of intelligence analysis is the job of Homeland Security, which is important since it is the only agency involved that has appointed officials for civil liberties and privacy. He said without oversight, agencies could collect the wrong information on the wrong people for the wrong reasons.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.