Lawmakers wary of new terrorist threat center

Several key lawmakers have warned an independent commission assembled to study the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks that the CIA should not oversee a new anti-terrorism center designed to integrate domestic and foreign intelligence data.

Congress required the Homeland Security Department to implement a system for analyzing information on terrorist threats, but a separate entity known as the Terrorist Threat Integration Center (TTIC) is housed within the CIA and will serve as a central repository for all government intelligence information. Sen. Joseph Lieberman, D-Conn., said the Bush administration unwisely placed that center there.

"The administration has ... created a weak intelligence-analysis unit inside the department and a brand new threat-integration center under the command of the director of central intelligence," Lieberman told the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States, also known as the 9-11 Commission. "I fear it will not do what is necessary to prevent further terrorism from occurring."

Congress passed legislation last fall creating the 9-11 Commission and charged it with providing a full accounting of the Sept. 11 attacks by next year and with recommending ways to avoid similar tragedies. The commission hosted a two-day meeting on Thursday and Friday to consider Congress' oversight role and the response of federal agencies to the attacks.

Alabama Republican Richard Shelby, the former chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said that a forthcoming report from a joint congressional inquiry into Sept. 11 examines how a lack of resources in the intelligence community contributed to their failure to identify or distribute information that might have helped prevent the attacks. The lawmakers at the hearing pressed the 9-11 Commission to exhaustively explore the issues raised in that report.

Commission member and former Republican Sen. Slade Gorton of Washington asked the lawmakers whether the CIA, FBI and other intelligence units are quickly implementing post-Sept. 11 changes that Congress and other groups have recommended.

Shelby said there has not been enough "wholesale change." Even today, Lieberman added, "our intelligence community remains divided and trapped behind many of the same bureaucratic barriers that spelled disaster in the months leading up to" Sept. 11.

But Rep. Jane Harman, D-Calif., suggested that intelligence officials have taken steps to reform and plug intelligence gaps. The National Security Agency, for example, has obtained better technology systems, she said. "The FBI ... has good, possibly excellent, technology systems that can do data mining and state-of-the-art intelligence gathering," she added.

Lawmakers urged the commission to be unrelenting in its quest for access to executive-branch records. They also called for quicker de-classification of essential reports, including the findings the joint congressional inquiry, which concluded late last year. Harman said that report should be available to the commission by June.

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., and other lawmakers expressed frustration that the commission until now has been denied access to the report. McCain also called on the Bush administration to be more cooperative in providing security information that will help the commission fulfill its duty.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.