Activists, Democrats brace for Defense environment showdown
- By John Stanton
- May 13, 2003
- Comments
The issue has become increasingly politicized since it was first broached during the Clinton administration, and the Defense Department has been criticized by Democrats and Republicans alike for the effort. The administration has also run into resistance from state officials, particularly state attorneys general who worry the changes will weaken the federal backstop and result in more stringent controls on private companies.
Late last week, the House Resources Committee passed legislation sponsored by Resources Committee Chairman Richard Pombo, R-Calif., that would ease controls on military activities under the Endangered Species Act, federal marine mammal laws and other environmental statutes.
Pombo, along with the White House, has argued the laws can limit the military's ability to adequately prepare for war. However, administration officials such as Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Christie Whitman acknowledge there are no known instances where environmental rules have hampered Defense's ability to train its personnel.
Environmentalists and Democrats accuse the administration of seeking a wholesale exemption for the agency. For instance, one source charges the Pombo bill would not only apply to training areas but also to golf courses and swimming pools.
In the Senate, Defense backers have pushed a smaller package of exemptions, limiting the reforms to provisions of the Endangered Species Act that can put certain areas off-limits to development and other uses. However, several sources said that while the House has taken a more direct approach to the debate, GOP tactics in the Senate have concerned environmentalists and other opponents more.
One source explained that there is growing concern that Defense supporters will simply move a small piece of the larger proposal each year, using House attempts to pass a larger package as cover for an incremental erosion of federal environmental controls on military lands.
The House Armed Services Committee is expected to take up Pombo's bill Tuesday, and the Senate will likely address the issue next week during floor debate of the fiscal 2004 Defense reauthorization bill.
By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although GovExec.com does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.
The Vast Majority of IRS Employees Aren't Corrupt
GSA Mishandled Executive Bonuses
EIG 2013 as Told by Your Tweets
Infographic: Nominee Limbo
Will You Be Furloughed?
Boldly Go Where No Fed's Gone Before
Sponsored
3 Ways Data is Improving DoD Performance
Need to Know Memo: Big Data
Cutting costs: Inside the effort to improve the efficiency of federal operations
Addressing the 3 Biggest BYOD Security Threats
