Agencies craft policies for dealing with ‘severe’ terror threat

Federal executives across the country are developing policies to help them decide when to close federal offices and how best to protect their employees if the nation's threat level is raised to red, indicating a "severe" risk of terrorist attacks.

The Homeland Security Department could issue a red alert for a specific region, or even a specific building, according to several federal officials. "The information would have to be very imminent, specific, and credible," department spokesman Gordon Johndroe said Monday. Johndroe added that there are no plans to raise the terror threat level. The nation currently faces a "high" risk of possible terrorist attacks, which is orange on the color-coded terrorism alert system.

Last week, the Federal Protective Service, (FPS), the Homeland Security agency that protects federal buildings, issued a policy clarifying how federal facilities would respond if the terror threat level were raised to red. In a code red scenario, federal offices would not necessarily close, but agency heads would work with the Federal Protective Service to keep employees safe, according to Chris Bentley, a spokesman with the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which includes FPS.

"When the alert level goes from orange to red, that doesn't necessarily close the federal buildings in one fell swoop," he said. "On a location by location basis they'll look at all the information they have about a threat and act accordingly."

Although agency heads would have the final say over whether to stay open in this scenario, FPS would be the lead agency for deciding how to proceed, Bentley said. "FPS is responsible for the security of the actual building, so yes they would be the lead in that situation," he said.

But some federal leaders already have decided to close shop if the threat level is raised to red. In Minnesota, a code red would prompt some closures, according to Ray Morris, executive director of the Minnesota Federal Executive Board. "A number of those agencies would interpret a red level threat as a closure situation," he said.

Other federal officials said they would follow the lead of FPS. "We'll look to them for guidance," said Susanne Valdez, executive director of the St. Louis Federal Executive Board. In Oregon, federal agencies would work with FPS and the FBI to determine the best course of action, according to Ron Johnson, executive director of the Portland Federal Executive Board.

In Washington, the Office of Personnel Management determines the government's operating status in potential terrorism situations after consulting the Federal Emergency Management Agency and General Services Administration. But here, as in other regions, agency heads decide whether to close their facilities, according to OPM spokesman Scott Hatch.

"Every agency has jurisdiction over their employees," he said, adding agencies typically notify OPM when they close.

Officials cautioned that closure decisions would be guided by the nature of the threat. Many agencies are prepared to keep their employees inside in the event of a chemical or radiological attack. "It would be a much greater risk to shut down federal offices in the area and send employees out where they could be contaminated," said Gladean Butler, executive director of the Dallas-Fort Worth Federal Executive Board. "The smarter decision would be to keep employees inside the building on lockdown," Butler said.

Recent anti-war protests in major U.S. cities have forced some federal executives to decide whether to close facilities. On Friday, employees at Chicago's One Federal Center complex were sent home early because of protests, according to OPM's Hatch.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.