Agencies craft policies for dealing with ‘severe’ terror threat

Federal executives across the country are developing policies to help them decide when to close federal offices and how best to protect their employees if the nation's threat level is raised to red, indicating a "severe" risk of terrorist attacks.

The Homeland Security Department could issue a red alert for a specific region, or even a specific building, according to several federal officials. "The information would have to be very imminent, specific, and credible," department spokesman Gordon Johndroe said Monday. Johndroe added that there are no plans to raise the terror threat level. The nation currently faces a "high" risk of possible terrorist attacks, which is orange on the color-coded terrorism alert system.

Last week, the Federal Protective Service, (FPS), the Homeland Security agency that protects federal buildings, issued a policy clarifying how federal facilities would respond if the terror threat level were raised to red. In a code red scenario, federal offices would not necessarily close, but agency heads would work with the Federal Protective Service to keep employees safe, according to Chris Bentley, a spokesman with the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which includes FPS.

"When the alert level goes from orange to red, that doesn't necessarily close the federal buildings in one fell swoop," he said. "On a location by location basis they'll look at all the information they have about a threat and act accordingly."

Although agency heads would have the final say over whether to stay open in this scenario, FPS would be the lead agency for deciding how to proceed, Bentley said. "FPS is responsible for the security of the actual building, so yes they would be the lead in that situation," he said.

But some federal leaders already have decided to close shop if the threat level is raised to red. In Minnesota, a code red would prompt some closures, according to Ray Morris, executive director of the Minnesota Federal Executive Board. "A number of those agencies would interpret a red level threat as a closure situation," he said.

Other federal officials said they would follow the lead of FPS. "We'll look to them for guidance," said Susanne Valdez, executive director of the St. Louis Federal Executive Board. In Oregon, federal agencies would work with FPS and the FBI to determine the best course of action, according to Ron Johnson, executive director of the Portland Federal Executive Board.

In Washington, the Office of Personnel Management determines the government's operating status in potential terrorism situations after consulting the Federal Emergency Management Agency and General Services Administration. But here, as in other regions, agency heads decide whether to close their facilities, according to OPM spokesman Scott Hatch.

"Every agency has jurisdiction over their employees," he said, adding agencies typically notify OPM when they close.

Officials cautioned that closure decisions would be guided by the nature of the threat. Many agencies are prepared to keep their employees inside in the event of a chemical or radiological attack. "It would be a much greater risk to shut down federal offices in the area and send employees out where they could be contaminated," said Gladean Butler, executive director of the Dallas-Fort Worth Federal Executive Board. "The smarter decision would be to keep employees inside the building on lockdown," Butler said.

Recent anti-war protests in major U.S. cities have forced some federal executives to decide whether to close facilities. On Friday, employees at Chicago's One Federal Center complex were sent home early because of protests, according to OPM's Hatch.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.