The White House's cybersecurity specialist on Tuesday lobbied technologists attending a conference to support his recommendation that the private sector and federal government create an "Internet operations center" to constantly monitor the Internet for attacks.
Speaking at a conference sponsored by the Internet security company Symantec, Richard Clarke, head of the White House Office of Cyberspace Security, said the federal government should take a greater role in updating and securing Internet protocols. He asked attendees to send their reactions and comments about both ideas, as well as the draft cybersecurity strategy released last month, to the White House.
Clarke said he envisions an Internet operations center where 15 to 20 of the nation's largest Internet service providers (ISPs) and router and security companies would provide constant data on the state of the Internet. The government would not run the center, but it would receive some government funding, he said. A university or national laboratory could host the center, he said.
"Nowhere is there a synaptic view of the Internet. ... Nowhere can you go to get a real-time look at ... whether there is a virus spreading or a huge denial-of-service attack," Clarke said. "There needs to be some place for that, not in the government, though we might help put it together and pay for it ... but a place for that synaptic view to know if we are under attack."
Clarke said ISPs and telecommunications companies approached him with the idea of a monitoring center, leading him to believe that the private sector would participate. Clarke said he hopes to include the center in the final strategy and recommend that Congress fund it. He said the cost is not likely to be large, though he declined to elaborate.
On Internet protocols, Clarke said the government could participate in Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) meetings and fund IETF test beds as they develop more secure protocols. There is an IETF security group focused on the issue, he said, "but often it takes a long time for the IETF to test those protocols because of lack of test beds," which the government could help foster.
Clarke reiterated that the government should not regulate cybersecurity and that market forces would result in companies and individuals doing more to protect their computer networks. He also rejected the idea that the government could offer tax incentives to companies that implement cybersecurity plans. He said that would mean less money in the treasury, and there is no way to target how money from the tax incentive would be spent.