Double-dip retirement measure may become law

A little-known pay measure, set to become law, could turn into a budget-busting problem for the Defense Department, officials said.

At issue is "concurrent receipt." If enacted, the legislation may cost DoD around $58 billion extra over the next decade.

Concurrent receipt is sometimes called "double dipping." Since the 1890s, Congress has prohibited the receipt of two pays for the same purpose. The specific instance of concurrent receipt at issue deals with Veterans Administration disability payments and military retirement.

Currently, military retirees who receive VA disability payments have their retired pay reduced dollar-for-dollar by the VA payment. So, for example, if retired pay is $1,000 a month and the VA disability payment is $500 a month, the member receives $1,000 per month-the entire VA payment and $500 in retired pay.

Retired pay is fully taxable; VA disability payments are not taxed.

Charles Abell, assistant defense secretary for force management policy, says the theory behind the current system is that if a service member completes military service and receives retired pay, and then also receives a VA payment for a condition related to that service, "it is two pays for the same event."

The government has always treated this as double dipping. According to a study commissioned by DoD, VA disability compensation is intended for veterans who separated from military service without retirement, but who suffered service-connected conditions that affect their earnings. Alternatively, service members "receiving military retired pay are considered to be fully compensated for their service, including any disability."

The concurrent receipt legislation, part of the fiscal 2003 National Defense Authorization Bill, would allow retirees receiving 60 percent disability or more to receive their full disability and their full retirement. Money spent on this, the Office of Management and Budget argues, would be better spent in developing warfighting capabilities.

The 10-year, $58 billion cost estimates floated by OMB and Congressional Budget Office are soft, Abell said. The amount is based on the idea that 700,000 to 800,000 veterans would qualify. The number could go as high as 1.2 million, he said.

"We don't know," Abell said. "Right now, some don't put in for this because there is no benefit to them. They might apply if there is a benefit." There are more than 25 million veterans in the United States.

DoD research shows that the small number of veterans who would benefit from such a repeal are already doing well financially, Abell said. He maintains that the money to pay the double-dip will have to come from accounts now going to readiness and quality of life programs.

"Active duty soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines are going to live in substandard quarters and work in hangars where the roof leaks or try to perform the mission without all the spare parts they need because $58 billion will flow over to a group that, when measured against the American population at large, is certainly well-off," he said.

Abell said he could find nothing in the public or private sectors with a truly analogous pay situation.

DoD has made its position on concurrent receipt known to the House and Senate authorizers.

"In our view, this is not good government," Abell said. "We should know in the next 30 days what Congress will do. When the legislation gets to the White House, advisers will look at it and provide their recommendations to the president, and he'll decide what to do."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.