House homeland panel reverses field on baggage-screening deadline

The House Select Homeland Security Committee reversed itself Friday, first voting to retain a year-end deadline for the Transportation Security Administration to implement baggage-sreeening systems at airports, then later accepting an amendment shifting the deadline to Dec. 31, 2003.

Friday morning, the committee accepted, on a 6-3 vote, an amendment offered by Democratic Caucus Vice Chairman Robert Menendez of New Jersey to keep the current deadline for setting up explosive-detection systems at airports. The deadline was included in the legislation creating the TSA last fall.

House Majority Leader Dick Armey, R-Texas, who drafted the homeland security legislation and chairs the ad hoc committee, tucked a provision into the legislation Thursday that would have removed the deadline.

Friday, Armey said his decision was a tough one, but it was "the right one"-and one he could make because he plans to retire at the end of the year. But Republican Conference Chairman J.C. Watts of Oklahoma and Rep. Deborah Pryce, R-Ohio, joined Democrats in voting to strip the language from the bill.

Later, though, Watts backed a measure to shift the deadline for implementing explosive-detection systems as far back as March 31, 2004. Republicans argued that the current deadline was simply unrealistic and would require airports to implement inferior systems.

"We want the best technology in airports as possible," said House Majority Whip Tom Delay, R-Texas.

But the amendment drew the ire of Democrats on the panel. Currently, "very little baggage gets checked [for explosives]," said Menendez. "The overwhelming percentage goes unchecked. That's why Congress overwhelmingly voted to have deadlines-to keep those people's feet to the fire to produce those explosive detection devices as soon as possible."

In the end, though, the panel voted 6-3 to accept a compromise offered by Rep. Martin Frost, D-Texas, to shift the deadline to Dec. 31, 2003.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.