Bipartisan group pushes for homeland security department

A bipartisan group of House and Senate lawmakers on Thursday introduced a bill to establish a Cabinet-level Department of National Homeland Security and a White House Office of Combating Terrorism, despite not having obtained White House backing for the idea.

Within the department, an office of science and technology would act as an interagency clearinghouse for new technologies to assist in improving homeland security. The tech office would be authorized at $200 million in fiscal 2003 to accelerate research, development, testing and evaluation of security technologies.

"All of us have people coming to us with great ideas," Rep. Mac Thornberry, R-Texas, said at a news conference. "We need to sort out the good from the bad and get it to the 'first responders' " to emergencies.

The department would consist of the Critical Infrastructure Assurance Office, the National Infrastructure Protection Center, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the Customs Service, the enforcement branch of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, the Coast Guard and other agencies.

The bill represents an amalgamation of bipartisan efforts that have been developing on both sides of Capitol Hill, though the tech clearinghouse is a new component. Co-sponsors of the legislation include: Sens. Joseph Lieberman, D-Conn.; Arlen Specter, R-Pa.; and Bob Graham, D-Fla.; and Reps. Jane Harman and Ellen Tauscher, both California Democrats; and Jim Gibbons, R-Nev. All of the sponsors serve on key defense or intelligence committees.

Establishment of the office would help bring accountability for the nearly $38 billion and growing that Congress has approved for homeland security, the sponsors said. The bill also would make it possible for Congress to summon White House Homeland Security Director Tom Ridge to testify.

The measure would give Ridge the statutory and budgetary authority he needs to accomplish homeland security goals, Lieberman said.

The bill did not move last year, at the request of President Bush, but sponsors said Congress should not wait any longer. "The reintroduction of this bill on a bipartisan basis has traction," Harman said.

Lieberman said he is "encouraged" by indications of support from Ridge and the White House. In a late-morning briefing, Ridge said the White House has not closed any doors on the issue.

The creation of the position seeks not only to address coordination in the domestic terrorism fight but also the ever-present government turf fight, members said.

"The most important parlor game in Washington is the game of 'turf war,'" said Gibbons, citing maneuverings in the defense, justice and intelligence communities. "This bill is going to give [Ridge] the vested authority he's going to need to fight that turf war."

Graham graded the performance of Ridge's office after six months. He said it scored fairly well on influence over the budget, though Ridge does not decide how to spend the money, and access to key officials, though he has failed to convert his personal relationship with the president into action.

Graham also noted that while Ridge's office is in the White House, his staffers, many of whom are temporarily on loan from other agencies, are located elsewhere in Washington.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.