Energy Department reports on releases of nuclear information

The Energy Department recently identified 175 documents containing 318 pages of mostly nuclear weapons-related information that it says were accidentally made publicly available by the United States in recent years, according to the declassified version of a report issued this week.

The documents have been withdrawn from public access, and the department is planning to assess any damage to national security that may have resulted from their release.

They included information ranging from nuclear weapons design to Navy nuclear propulsion system information to decades-old information on the locations of nuclear weapons storage depots.

The documents were discovered during an ongoing department review of 2 million pages of publicly available records kept by the National Archives and Records Administration.

Congress was notified of the discoveries in a mandated, classified November 2001 report. The Energy Department released an excised version of that report Tuesday.

The identified documents, dating from the early 1950s to the mid-1970s, contained "restricted data" and "formerly restricted data." The Energy Department report said the State and Defense departments inadvertently declassified the material from 1995 to 1998, making it available to the public through the Archives.

"The improper marking of the documents for classification level, classification category and/or downgrading may have contributed to the inadvertent release of the documents," the report said.

Steven Aftergood, a Federation of American Scientists intelligence analyst, however, criticized the Energy review for impeding public access to declassified information that may not deserve to be removed.

Aftergood noted the Energy report said the removed material "may" contain classified nuclear information and observed it revealed decades-old information on locations of nuclear weapons storage depots. Such information, he wrote, might be politically sensitive, but "while formally classified, do[es] not pose a proliferation hazard."

"The fact that we may have had nuclear weapons in Japan or Greece or elsewhere 30 to 50 years ago is hardly a threat to national security today," Aftergood said in an interview.

"The reason this is a difficult policy issue is not all of that information is of that benign character," he said, noting nuclear weapons design information has been found in this and previous reviews that warrants removal from public access.

The congressionally mandated reports were required after it was discovered in the 1990s that a large number of nuclear weapons documents were either unmarked or mislabeled and as a result were declassified and made available through the public archives, Aftergood said.

More selective targeting of information, enabling much less money and time to be spent on combing through documents, would be a better policy, he said.

According to the unclassified report, the retracted documents contained information on such subjects as the mass or dimensions of fissile materials, pits or nuclear assembly systems; high explosives for nuclear weapons; boosting systems; other nuclear weapon design, function, uses or configurations, or nuclear test information; and Navy nuclear propulsion systems.

Such information concerns the early generations of nuclear weapons the country developed in the 1950s and may be of use abroad, the report said.

"Potential adversaries, emerging proliferant nations and terrorist groups aggressively target U.S. nuclear weapon information. Information regarding older nuclear weapons is of significant value since it is often technically less sophisticated. These designs would be most readily used by a would-be nuclear proliferant to obtain its first nuclear weapon," according to the report.

Khidhir Hamza, former director of Iraq's nuclear weapons program, has said copies of declassified U.S. Manhattan Project reports provided an early blueprint for Iraq's nuclear weapons program.

The formerly restricted documents also contained information on nuclear weapons stockpile quantities, storage locations, costs, yields and delivery system accuracy, the report said.

That information "could assist potential adversaries in assessing the strengths of the U.S. nuclear arsenal" and some of its release could violate international agreements and harm diplomatic ties with foreign host countries, the report said.

The information on Navy nuclear propulsion, the report said, could help other countries develop better propulsion systems for their surface ships and submarines.

The British Defense Ministry earlier this week recalled publicly available documents with detailed information on constructing the first British nuclear bomb, British officials said.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by Brocade

    Best of 2016 Federal Forum eBook

    Earlier this summer, Federal and tech industry leaders convened to talk security, machine learning, network modernization, DevOps, and much more at the 2016 Federal Forum. This eBook includes a useful summary highlighting the best content shared at the 2016 Federal Forum to help agencies modernize their network infrastructure.

  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    GBC Flash Poll Series: Merger & Acquisitions

    Download this GBC Flash Poll to learn more about federal perspectives on the impact of industry consolidation.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    A DevOps Roadmap for the Federal Government

    This GBC Report discusses how DevOps is steadily gaining traction among some of government's leading IT developers and agencies.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.

  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    Joint Enterprise Licensing Agreements

    Read this eBook to learn how defense agencies can achieve savings and efficiencies with an Enterprise Software Agreement.

  • Sponsored by Cloudera

    Government Forum Content Library

    Get all the essential resources needed for effective technology strategies in the federal landscape.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.