Siebel CEO outlines critical nature of information sharing

About a week after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, Tom Siebel, founder and CEO of Siebel Systems, enlisted former CIA and FBI employees to help the San Mateo, Calif., applications-software company develop tools to boost homeland security.

The efforts resulted in a retooled version of Siebel's business-application software that the company has been promoting and demonstrating to government agencies, lawmakers, government contractors, Bush administration officials and journalists. The technology enables the government's thousands of different computer systems to communicate with one another to track potential terrorist activity.

"We have spent $1 billion over the past eight years in developing [business applications] software ... and we thought we could use this approach for homeland security," Siebel said in an interview with National Journal Group reporters. "We are just trying to contribute what we know."

At the core of Siebel's homeland security software is a program that tracks patterns of activity in databases. As part of the company's demonstration, Siebel sketched a timeline of the data that the FBI, CIA, Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Treasury Department, and state and local police collected about the Sept. 11 terrorists over the past two years.

If the agencies had used Siebel's software to connect their databases and analyze the patterns, the government may have been alerted about the attacks in advance, Siebel argued.

For example, Siebel noted that in June 2000, the CIA knew that terrorist ringleader Mohamed Atta had met with an Iraqi agent in Prague, Czech Republic. Later that month, the INS knew that Atta entered the United States through New York. In early July, Treasury knew that Atta had received a $100,000 wire transfer from an operative of Osama bin Laden. Later in July, the FAA knew that Atta enrolled in a Florida aviation school.

Yet because each agency only had a piece of the data, it was not enough to sound an alarm. "It was kind of an absurd organizational failure," Siebel said.

Government officials are starting to understand the impact that the lack of information sharing may have played in the attacks. In President Bush's fiscal 2003 budget request, the Commerce Department's Critical Infrastructure Assurance Office would receive $20 million to form an Information Integration Office, which would design and help implement an information-sharing architecture. Homeland Security Director Tom Ridge also said this week that information sharing needs to be a permanent part of the nation's technology infrastructure.

Siebel said his company's demonstrations have helped shift perspective on the urgent need for information sharing. "In our little way, we are having influence," he said.

Siebel could not calculate how much it would cost to integrate all government agencies beyond the expectation of "billions" of dollars. It also would take years of work. He estimated that it would take at minimum 18 months to get all of the INS' databases intercommunicating.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.