Bush administration scraps contractor responsibility rule

The Bush administration has revoked a Clinton-era rule that set labor, environmental and ethics standards for companies that do business with Uncle Sam. In the Dec. 27 Federal Register, the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Council issued a final rule repealing the contractor responsibility rule. The regulation, which opponents termed the "blacklisting" rule for its alleged effect on business, spelled out specific legal violations that companies must avoid to be eligible to win government contracts. The rule took effect one day before President Clinton left office but has been suspended since April 3, when the FAR Council issued a stay on the rule. In addition, many agencies exempted themselves from the rule in early February by invoking a clause in the Federal Acquisition Regulation that allows agencies to exempt themselves from new rules. Rep. Tom Davis, R-Va., hailed the repeal of the rule, according to Melissa Wojciak, staff director of the House Government Reform Subcommittee on Technology and Procurement Policy, which Davis chairs. "[Davis] believed the original rule was issued during a political season, and could never withstand appropriate scrutiny," she said. "He's glad the issue has finally resolved itself." The Bush decision marks a win for federal contractors and some procurement experts, who argued the regulation placed a difficult burden on contracting officers, who would have been forced to evaluate the ethics of potential contractors under the rule. A different provision in the Federal Acquisition Regulation still requires contracting officers to determine if a potential contractor is "responsible," but this existing rule does not force officers to research the legal practices of companies. For example, in March the Army awarded a $33 million logistics contract to Houston-based Eagle Global Logistics Inc., a company that has been accused of widespread racial and gender discrimination by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). To determine if Eagle was "responsible,"-the current threshold for potential federal contractors--the Army checked the government's list of debarred and suspended contractors and found that Eagle was an eligible contractor. The Army did not search for adverse reports by federal commissions such as the EEOC, a step that would have been required under the now-revoked contractor responsibility rule. Labor and environmental groups supported the rule. Vice President Al Gore first proposed the regulation in a 1997 speech to the AFL-CIO.
Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.