Appropriators fail to meet on Defense spending bill

Appropriators failed to meet Tuesday to begin reconciling the House and Senate versions of $20 billion in supplemental anti- terrorism spending, but House Appropriations Committee Chairman Bill Young, R-Fla., and Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., traded jabs about which side was to blame for the lack of progress.

After meeting with Byrd and Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta on another matter Tuesday, Young cited Byrd's continued interest in increasing the supplemental for domestic security when he discussed the fiscal 2002 Defense spending bill. Young indicated that Byrd's staff had taken that position when top staffers from the two committees met Monday.

"As long as we can work within the $20 billion, I think we can work it out," Young said. "Both of us are going to have to give a little. But we have to stay within the $20 billion."

President Bush repeatedly threatened to veto the supplemental, which is attached to the $317 billion Defense bill, if it exceeded $20 billion. Byrd attempted to add another $15 billion during last week's Senate floor debate but was defeated on a point of order.

House Appropriations Committee sources said whenever a meeting occurs among the four principals--Young, Byrd, House Appropriations ranking member David Obey, D-Wis., and Senate Appropriations ranking member Ted Stevens, R-Alaska--Young will propose that the two chambers split the difference on the defense funding level, stay as close as possible to the Senate number for New York and pare funding for domestic security.

The Senate-passed supplemental contains $2 billion for defense, $9.5 billion for New York and domestic recovery, and $8.5 billion for domestic security--a compromise Byrd, Stevens and Defense Appropriations Chairman Daniel Inouye, D-Hawaii, have agreed to.

The House supplemental provided $7.2 billion for defense-- nearly the full $7.3 billion the White House wants--plus $7.4 billion for New York and $5.4 billion for domestic security.

Although Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld has urged Congress to give the Pentagon the entire $7.3 billion supplemental it requested, Stevens told reporters Tuesday that not providing the full amount could prompt faster action in Congress.

Stevens said that given the President's authority to cover defense expenses in the short run, the supplemental defense number is "a symbol of support [for the troops] rather than a need for support right now." He added, "If you want to be blunt about it, we're better off having a demand for defense on the supplemental, because that way it moves faster."

Byrd said the Defense Department--which already has gotten $13.7 billion out of the $20 billion in supplemental funds the White House controls--has "more money than they spend." Byrd said the Pentagon has received a total of $42 billion more than fiscal 2001.

Byrd also emphasized to reporters that he is not trying to re- fight the battle for extra supplemental money he lost on the floor. "It is absolutely not my position." Instead, Byrd stressed, "I'm pushing the Senate position. This is what we voted for."

As for when the Defense bill can be finalized, Stevens said: "This is going to be a very difficult bill to put together. It's going to be awfully hard to finish this week."

He predicted it would be finished "by early next week."

Stevens also predicted the Senate would prevail over the House on leasing Boeing 767s to use as air refueling tankers. "I think we'll win that one," he said.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.