Army chief cites air power limits, accelerates reform

Military operations in Afghanistan are proving that the best precision weapons in the U.S. arsenal are soldiers on the ground, Army Chief of Staff Gen. Eric Shinseki told defense and industry leaders Thursday. In prepared remarks before a Washington conference sponsored by the Association of the United States Army, an Army lobbying group based in Arlington, Va., Shinseki said air strikes against Taliban and al Queda forces in Afghanistan have not been fully effective. Long-range precision strikes are a "great capability, but [they don't] solve the problem," Shinseki said. Precision weapons, such as laser-guided missiles and bombs, have never worked well against imprecise or mobile targets, and the U.S. reliance on them in military operations over the last several years may well have emboldened enemies of the United States to escalate their operations against the country, Shiniseki said. Ground forces are often the only way to attack "conflicted targets"-assets that are shielded in mosques or hospitals, for instance, where striking them will endanger innocent people, or targets that are difficult to find from the air, such as those in caves and deep bunkers, Shinseki said. "We must be able to attack conflicted targets with a variety of weapons without collateral effects. And right now, we cannot do this very well-and we never have," he said. Shinseki said the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon have added urgency to the Army's ongoing plans to create several medium-weight brigades that are more powerful than its light infantry forces, yet more agile than its heavy-armored tank forces. U.S. tanks are the most lethal in the world, but can take months to transport to the battlefield. The first medium-weight brigade is to be fielded and operational in the spring of 2003, but Army officials are trying to speed that up by several months. The brigades are meant to solve a critical problem for the Army: It can't move sufficiently powerful forces to the battlefield in time for war. Its light infantry troops are too vulnerable to attack in most situations, and its heavy forces are too cumbersome to arrive on short notice. The new brigades will not be as powerful or invulnerable as tank units, but they will be vastly more lethal and more versatile than light-infantry units. The Army views the medium-weight brigades as an "interim force" that will fill its current gaps in capability while it seeks to meet its long-term objective of fielding units that are faster-moving, more powerful, and less vulnerable than anything currently in the inventory. What exactly that future force, known as the "objective force," will ultimately look like will depend largely on technology that is still under development, Shinseki said. Nonetheless, he intends to make transformation to such a force inevitable. He acknowledged critics-many within the Army itself-who say he is moving too fast to shift the Army away from its vaunted tank divisions, which were so critical in winning the Persian Gulf War. "Those who say we are going too fast endanger the Army's relevance to national security. It's no longer a matter of complaining that we're moving too fast or spending too much money on the development of new technologies," he said. "It's not a debate. The Army must change because the nation cannot afford to have an army that is irrelevant."
Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • GBC Issue Brief: The Future of 9-1-1

    A Look Into the Next Generation of Emergency Services

  • GBC Survey Report: Securing the Perimeters

    A candid survey on cybersecurity in state and local governments

  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.

  • eBook: State & Local Cybersecurity

    CenturyLink is committed to helping state and local governments meet their cybersecurity challenges. Towards that end, CenturyLink commissioned a study from the Government Business Council that looked at the perceptions, attitudes and experiences of state and local leaders around the cybersecurity issue. The results were surprising in a number of ways. Learn more about their findings and the ways in which state and local governments can combat cybersecurity threats with this eBook.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.