Pentagon under pressure to delay or divide Joint Strike Fighter contract

Supporters of the Boeing Co., bracing for yet another big loss, are pressuring the Pentagon to delay or divvy up a massive new contract for next-generation fighter jets to replace the military's existing wing of warplanes.

Allies of the aerospace giant fear that granting rival Lockheed Martin Corp. the entire $200 billion joint strike fighter contract would deal a devastating blow to Boeing, even as its commercial aircraft business continues to reel from last month's terrorist attacks.

Republican Sen. Christopher (Kit) Bond and Democratic Sen. Jean Carnahan, both of Missouri, back a proposal to force the Pentagon to award the loser of the fighter jet contract with one- third of the project's manufacturing.

Others have urged the Defense Department to delay Friday's deadline for a decision.

"There is an increasing feeling that there should be a delay in that contract," said Senate Appropriations Committee ranking member Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, who spoke with senior Pentagon officials about the issue last week.

Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld is scheduled to announce the winner Friday after the financial markets close, his spokeswoman said Tuesday.

"It makes absolutely no sense to give the winner the whole contract," Bond asserted. Bond and several other members of Congress fear that a winner-take-all deal might force the loser out of the fighter-jet manufacturing business, leaving one company to dominate the market.

"It makes no sense to have one tactical aircraft producer," Bond declared.

Several defense analysts predict that Lockheed is poised to win the contract.

Bond said he would consider adding legislation to the defense authorization bill or the fiscal 2002 Defense appropriations bill.

Carnahan, who urged the split in a letter to Rumsfeld last week, insisted that the Missouri delegation still believes Boeing will win the contact. "It's sort of a backup plan," she said.

Boeing's St. Louis-based manufacturing plant stands to lose 3,000-5,000 jobs if the Defense Department gives the contract to Lockheed.

As a result, some analysts view the Missouri plan as a covert way to protect home-state jobs.

"The assumption is that the senators are reflecting parochial interests, so what they say has to be taken with a grain of salt," said Loren Thompson, a defense analyst with the Lexington Institute.

Bond maintained that he is acting on his own and not at Boeing's behest.

"This is not Boeing," he said. "I think I caused them some heartburn when I proposed it." However, he said, "They know what I am doing."

A Boeing spokeswoman denied that the company is lobbying for a split. "We think we have a winning proposal," she said.

Another plan floated by Boeing's congressional allies calls for the Pentagon to purchase dozens of Boeing's refueling planes to help with bombing raids on Afghanistan.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by Brocade

    Best of 2016 Federal Forum eBook

    Earlier this summer, Federal and tech industry leaders convened to talk security, machine learning, network modernization, DevOps, and much more at the 2016 Federal Forum. This eBook includes a useful summary highlighting the best content shared at the 2016 Federal Forum to help agencies modernize their network infrastructure.

  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    GBC Flash Poll Series: Merger & Acquisitions

    Download this GBC Flash Poll to learn more about federal perspectives on the impact of industry consolidation.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    A DevOps Roadmap for the Federal Government

    This GBC Report discusses how DevOps is steadily gaining traction among some of government's leading IT developers and agencies.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.

  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    Joint Enterprise Licensing Agreements

    Read this eBook to learn how defense agencies can achieve savings and efficiencies with an Enterprise Software Agreement.

  • Sponsored by Cloudera

    Government Forum Content Library

    Get all the essential resources needed for effective technology strategies in the federal landscape.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.