Defense Department continues to push for base closings

Military base closings and realignments are even more necessary in the aftermath of the recent terrorist attacks in New York City and at the Pentagon, according to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. "In the wake of the terrible events of Sept. 11, the imperative to convert excess capacity into warfighting capability is enhanced, not diminished," Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld wrote in a Sept. 21 letter to Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee. "Since that fateful day, the Congress has provided billions of taxpayer funds to the department. We owe it to all seek every efficiency in application of those funds," Rumsfeld continued. The Senate could consider as early as today a proposed 2002 Defense authorization bill that calls for an additional round of military base closures in 2003. The House version of the bill does not permit additional base closings. Members of Congress have been reluctant to close bases because doing so can mean the loss of thousands of jobs in their home states and districts. Additionally, Rumsfeld wrote that although future force size is "uncertain," the Pentagon "must have the freedom" to strike a balance between force structure and infrastructure. The Pentagon has repeatedly said the Defense Department has 20 to 25 percent excess infrastructure that is draining billions of dollars from modernization and operating accounts. Rumsfeld said that closing military facilities is not something he "relishes." But, echoing remarks made by President Bush last week, he said, "we face new and sudden national challenges and those challenges will force us to confront many difficult choices."
Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.