GOP senator says budget chair has too much control over Defense spending

Before the Senate recessed for the July Fourth holiday, Appropriations Committee ranking member Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, expressed deep misgivings about the control the fiscal 2002 budget resolution grants Budget Chairman Kent Conrad, D-N.D., over the defense budget--control the new chairman has indicated he will not shrink from exercising. Conrad has repeatedly warned that the surplus outside of the Medicare and Social Security trust funds is dwindling for fiscal 2002, and could turn into a deficit in fiscal 2003. Conrad fears these trends will only be made worse as economic forecasts grow increasingly pessimistic, and as Congress considers the Bush administration's fiscal 2002 defense amendment and a boost in education funding. Neither of the latter items were covered in the budget resolution. After the administration requested another $18.4 billion for fiscal 2002 defense spending, on top of its initial request of $310.5 billion, Conrad wrote to President Bush "that additional funding may not be available to meet real defense needs. Under current projections, there is some room available in [fiscal]'02 for increases in spending above the level assumed in the budget resolution, but economic growth that is slower than was anticipated several months ago could cause even this to evaporate." Conrad has said any spending or tax cuts beyond what was in the budget resolution must be paid for with offsets, and asked Bush "how the administration believes the additional defense spending can be paid for if the economic outlook deteriorates and the non-Social Security, non-Medicare surplus for [fiscal]'02 is wiped out." Just last week, White House National Economic Council Director Lawrence Lindsey said fiscal 2001 tax revenues could be about $56 billion less than the $2 trillion projected, while Office of Management and Budget Director Mitch Daniels told CNN's "Inside Politics" that he anticipates current year revenues to run $20 billion to $30 billion below expectations--although both still projected substantial surpluses overall, and Daniels said the money would be there to cover the fiscal 2002 defense hike. The budget resolution states that the Budget Committee chairman may increase the fiscal 2002 defense spending allocation by the amount of the administration's request--but it also adds that the increase "may not, when taken together with all previously enacted legislation except legislation [drawing on the Medicare reserve fund], reduce the on-budget surplus below the level of the Medicare Hospital Insurance Trust Fund surplus in any fiscal year covered by this resolution." Conrad fears the latter could happen under the CBO's mid-session review, which comes out in August. Stevens, who is also ranking member of the Defense Appropriations Subcommittee, said the provision "gives the Budget Committee chairman leverage over the Armed Services Committee and Appropriations Committee that is unwarranted." "It's unconscionable to me, putting the power in one person to make that kind of decision. It's contrary to the law [that gives the Appropriations Committee jurisdiction over all discretionary spending] and it should not have been put in there," said Stevens. Even if Conrad fought the increase, he could be overruled by a 60-vote majority.
Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.