Coast Guard seeks final bids on major acquisition project
- By Kellie Lunney
- July 9, 2001
- Comments
The General Accounting Office has estimated that Deepwater is likely to have a price tag somewhere between $8 billion and $12 billion over the next two decades, and the Coast Guard estimates the project will take up to 30 years to complete. According to Lt. Commander Andrea Palermo, a Coast Guard spokeswoman, the three industry teams competing for the initial Deepwater contract must submit their final project proposals by Sep. 29. The agency plans to award the first five-year contract in April 2002. After that, five additional five-year contracts will be awarded based on the contractor's performance, she said. Competitors for the contract include Boeing Co., Integrated Coast Guard System (comprised of Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and Ingalls Shipbuilding), and Science Applications International Corp. Palermo said the Coast Guard has estimated it will need $300 million for Deepwater for fiscal 2002, and $500 million for every additional year during the life of the contract. In a May report on the risks associated with Deepwater, GAO said that during the current era of budget constraints and competing budget priorities at the Transportation Department, the high cost of the project could take away funds for other Coast Guard projects. The Coast Guard refuted GAO's claim, saying the agency would be able to fund Deepwater without any adverse impact on other projects and expressing optimism that Congress will continue to appropriate enough money each year to sustain the project. The House fiscal 2002 Transportation appropriations bill (H.R. 2299), which passed last month, includes $300 million for the long-term acquisition project. The bill is now in the Senate.
The Coast Guard has said it hopes to control Deepwater's costs by using commercial equipment and by encouraging competition among suppliers in subsequent five-year contracts.
By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although GovExec.com does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.
Older Feds Aren't Playing to Their Strengths
Is It Too Hard to Fire Misbehaving Feds?
Americans Still Like the Postal Service
A Forced 4-Day Weekend for Many Feds
No More Tax-Cheating Feds, Senators Say
Video: The Daily Show on Apple's Taxes
Sponsored
3 Ways Data is Improving DoD Performance
Need to Know Memo: Big Data
Cutting costs: Inside the effort to improve the efficiency of federal operations
Addressing the 3 Biggest BYOD Security Threats
